Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30155234›Full record

ArticleChemical science2018

Large-scale comparison of machine learning methods for drug target prediction on ChEMBL.

Andreas Mayr, Günter Klambauer, Thomas Unterthiner, Marvin Steijaert, Jörg K Wegner, Hugo Ceulemans, Djork-Arné Clevert, Sepp Hochreiter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 181 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
181citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

181 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Artificial intelligence-assisted lead optimization in drug discovery: bridging computational advances and translational challenges.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. A Framework for Autonomous AI-Driven Drug Discovery.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  16. Computer-Aided Discovery of Drugs Against Chagas Disease.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

121 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andreas MayrLIT AI Lab and Institute of Bioinformatics , Johannes Kepler University Linz , Austria . Email: hochreit@bioinf.jku.at ; ; Tel: +43-732-2468-4521.ORCID 0000-0002-1204-0881
Günter KlambauerLIT AI Lab and Institute of Bioinformatics , Johannes Kepler University Linz , Austria . Email: hochreit@bioinf.jku.at ; ; Tel: +43-732-2468-4521.ORCID 0000-0003-2861-5552
Thomas UnterthinerLIT AI Lab and Institute of Bioinformatics , Johannes Kepler University Linz , Austria . Email: hochreit@bioinf.jku.at ; ; Tel: +43-732-2468-4521.ORCID 0000-0001-5361-3087
Marvin SteijaertOpen Analytics NV , Belgium.
Jörg K WegnerJanssen Pharmaceutica NV , Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1852-9434
Hugo CeulemansJanssen Pharmaceutica NV , Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7059-4399
Djork-Arné ClevertBayer AG , Germany.
Sepp HochreiterLIT AI Lab and Institute of Bioinformatics , Johannes Kepler University Linz , Austria . Email: hochreit@bioinf.jku.at ; ; Tel: +43-732-2468-4521.ORCID 0000-0001-7449-2528

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 28660
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning is currently the most successful machine learning technique in a wide range of application areas and has recently been applied successfully in drug discovery research to predict potential drug targets and to screen for active molecules. However, due to (1) the lack of large-scale studies, (2) the compound series bias that is characteristic of drug discovery datasets and (3) the hyperparameter selection bias that comes with the high number of potential deep learning architectures, it remains unclear whether deep learning can indeed outperform existing computational methods in drug discovery tasks. We therefore assessed the performance of several deep learning methods on a large-scale drug discovery dataset and compared the results with those of other machine learning and target prediction methods. To avoid potential biases from hyperparameter selection or compound series, we used a nested cluster-cross-validation strategy. We found (1) that deep learning methods significantly outperform all competing methods and (2) that the predictive performance of deep learning is in many cases comparable to that of tests performed in wet labs (

Identifiers

PMID30155234
PMCPMC6011237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.