Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30154976›Full record

ArticleJournal of graduate medical education2018

A Cross-Specialty Examination of Resident Error Disclosure and Communication Skills Using Simulation.

Aimee K Gardner, Gi Lim, Charles G Minard, Danielle Guffey, M Tyson Pillow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of graduate medical education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Moving Toward Entrustment of Difficult Conversations.Journal of graduate medical education · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Models of teaching medical errors.Pakistan journal of medical sciences
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aimee K Gardner
Gi Lim
Charles G Minard
Danielle Guffey
M Tyson Pillow

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDisclosure of medical errors is important to patients and physicians, but formal disclosure training during the graduate medical education curriculum is limited.

objectiveWe examined resident competence related to error disclosure, using standardized patient (SP) ratings of resident communication skills.

methodsAll first-year residents from medicine, radiology, emergency medicine, orthopedic surgery, and neurological surgery completed a 20-minute simulated session in which they were provided background information on a medical error they had made and were asked to disclose the error to an SP acting as a family member. Residents were then debriefed and completed a postscenario questionnaire. The SPs completed an 11-item communication assessment and 3 milestone rating tools on professionalism (PROF-1, PROF-3) and interpersonal and communication skills (ICS-1).

resultsNinety-six residents from a single institution participated toward the end of the intern year. Communication assessment scores ranged from 23% to 100% (mean [SD], 80.6 [17.0]). Mean (SD) milestone ratings across specialties were 2.80 ± 0.92 for PROF-1, 2.48 ± 0.92 for PROF-3, and 2.45 ± 0.92 for ICS-1. One-way analysis of variance revealed no significant differences among specialties on milestone or communication ratings. Residents who accepted personal responsibility for the error (84.55 [14.06]) received significantly higher communication ratings from SPs compared with residents who did not (66.67 [19.52],

conclusionsThis SP assessment of error disclosure by first-year residents from multiple specialties was feasible and acceptable. It revealed areas of improvement as well as considerable variation in communication skills and professionalism among residents.

Indexed as

CommunicationInternship and ResidencyMedical ErrorsPhysician-Patient RelationsProfessional CompetenceTruth DisclosureAchievementCurriculumEducational MeasurementEmergency MedicineGeneral SurgeryHumansNeurologyOrthopedicsPatient SimulationPhysicians

Identifiers

PMID30154976
PMCPMC6108361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.