Observational studyJournal of graduate medical education2018
Influence of Clinical Competency Committee Review Process on Summative Resident Assessment Decisions.
Observational study in Journal of graduate medical education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of Pediatric Residents in the United States by Sex, Ethnoracial and Intersectional Group.Perspectives on medical education · 2026Article
- Factors associated with attainment of ad hoc entrustability among Taiwan otolaryngology resident physicians: a nationwide cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- EMYWAY Workplace-Based Entrustable Professional Activities Assessments in Otolaryngology Residency Training: A Nationwide Experience.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Article
- Investigating the Roles and Impact of Clinical Competency Committees in Graduate Medical Education: A Narrative Review.Journal of graduate medical education · 2024Review
- Features of Effective Clinical Competency Committees.Journal of graduate medical education · 2023Article
- An Analysis of Written and Numeric Scores in End-of-Rotation Forms from Three Residency Programs.Perspectives on medical education · 2023Article
- Harnessing Natural Language Processing to Support Decisions Around Workplace-Based Assessment: Machine Learning Study of Competency-Based Medical Education.JMIR medical education · 2022Article
- The Science of Effective Group Process: Lessons for Clinical Competency Committees.Journal of graduate medical education · 2021Article
- Launching the Next Steps to Improve Hospice and Palliative Medicine Fellow Performance Assessment: A Look Back to the Initial Toolkit of Assessment Methods.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2021Article
- Developing a dashboard to meet Competence Committee needs: a design-based research project.Canadian medical education journal · 2020Article
- A National Study of Longitudinal Consistency in ACGME Milestone Ratings by Clinical Competency Committees: Exploring an Aspect of Validity in the Assessment of Residents' Competence.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2019Article
- Clerkship Grading Committees: the Impact of Group Decision-Making for Clerkship Grading.Journal of general internal medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical Competency Committees (CCCs) are charged with making summative assessment decisions about residents.
objectiveWe explored how review processes CCC members utilize influence their decisions regarding residents' milestone levels and supervisory roles.
methodsWe conducted a multisite longitudinal prospective observational cohort study at 14 pediatrics residency programs during academic year 2015-2016. Individual CCC members biannually reported characteristics of their review process and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education milestone levels and recommended supervisory role categorizations assigned to residents. Relationships among characteristics of CCC member reviews, mean milestone levels, and supervisory role categorizations were analyzed using mixed-effects linear regression, reported as mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and Bayesian mixed-effects ordinal regression, reported as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs).
resultsA total of 155 CCC members participated. Members who provided milestones or other professional development feedback after CCC meetings assigned significantly lower mean milestone levels (mean 1.4 points; CI -2.2 to -0.6;
conclusionsThis study explored the association between characteristics of individual CCC member reviews and their summative assessment decisions about residents. Further study is needed to gain deeper understanding of factors influencing CCC members' summative assessment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.