Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30154945›Full record

ArticlePain research & management2018

Difference in Response to a Motor Imagery Task: A Comparison between Individuals with and without Painful Temporomandibular Disorders.

Daisuke Uritani, Tomoko Nishida, Nanami Sakaguchi, Tetsuji Kawakami, Lester E Jones, Tadaaki Kirita

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain research & management, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Daisuke UritaniDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Kio Univeristy, 4-2-2 Umaminaka, Koryocho, Kitakatsuragigun, Nara 6350832, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1009-1412
Tomoko NishidaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi Hospital, 15-749 Honmachi, Higashiyamaku, Kyoto 6050981, Japan.
Nanami SakaguchiDepartment of Rehabilitation, Higashiosaka Yamaji Hospital, 1-7-5 Inaba, Higashiosaka, Osaka 5780925, Japan.
Tetsuji KawakamiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara 6348521, Japan.
Lester E JonesJudith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Plenty Road, Bundoora, Melbourne, VIC 3086, Australia.
Tadaaki KiritaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara 6348521, Japan.
Nara Medical University · JPKyoto first Red Cross hospital · JPLa Trobe University · AUUji Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the difference in response to a motor imagery task between individuals with and without painful temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). The participants were 24 adults with and without TMD (TMD and control group, resp.). A set of photographic images of the profile view of a person's head and neck and a hand and a foot were presented in a random order. The set consisted of six different orientations with rotations of each image at 0, 60, 120, 180, 240, and 300 degrees and included left and right representations. The participants were required to view the image and make a decision as to whether it was a left or a right side presented, that is, mental rotation (MR) task. Data were collected on 48 tasks (including left and right) at each orientation for each body part. Reaction times (RTs) for correct answers and accuracy in making the left or right judgements were recorded. The RT was slower in the TMD group than in the control group. The RT for the profile image was slower than those for the hand and foot images. For images that were 180 degrees, the RT was slower and the accuracy was lower than those for five of the other image orientations. The judgements made about the 180-degree rotated image were more inaccurate compared to images of all other orientations among all types of stimuli.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceAnthropometryFacial PainFemaleHumansImagery, PsychotherapyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMotor ActivityOrientationPain MeasurementPhotic StimulationReaction Time

Identifiers

PMID30154945
PMCPMC6091325
OpenAlexW2886467728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.