Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30154818›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2018

High-Throughput Plant Phenotyping for Developing Novel Biostimulants: From Lab to Field or From Field to Lab?

Youssef Rouphael, Lukáš Spíchal, Klára Panzarová, Raffaele Casa, Giuseppe Colla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. PhenoWell®-A novel screening system for soil-grown plants.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Approaches to investigate crop responses to ozone pollution: from OThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Youssef RouphaelDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Portici, Italy.
Lukáš SpíchalDepartment of Chemical Biology and Genetics, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Faculty of Science, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czechia.
Klára PanzarováPhoton Systems Instruments, spol. s.r.o., Drasov, Czechia.
Raffaele CasaDepartment of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy.
Giuseppe CollaDepartment of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant biostimulants which include bioactive substances (humic acids, protein hydrolysates and seaweed extracts) and microorganisms (mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria of strains belonging to the genera

Indexed as

bioassayingfunctional characterizationhigh-throughput screeningimaging methodsintegrative phenotypingmode of actionmorpho-physiological traitsnutrient use efficiency

Identifiers

PMID30154818
PMCPMC6102389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.