Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30154752›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2018

Compatibility Between Physical Stimulus Size - Spatial Position and False Recognitions.

Seda Dural, Birce B Burhanoǧlu, Nilsu Ekinci, Emre Gürbüz, İdil U Akın, Seda Can, Hakan Çetinkaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Seda DuralDepartment of Psychology, İzmir University of Economics, İzmir, Turkey.
Birce B BurhanoǧluDepartment of Psychology, İzmir University of Economics, İzmir, Turkey.
Nilsu EkinciDepartment of Psychology, İzmir University of Economics, İzmir, Turkey.
Emre GürbüzDepartment of Psychology, İzmir University of Economics, İzmir, Turkey.
İdil U AkınDepartment of Psychology, İzmir University of Economics, İzmir, Turkey.
Seda CanDepartment of Psychology, İzmir University of Economics, İzmir, Turkey.
Hakan ÇetinkayaDepartment of Psychology, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnitude processing is of great interest to researchers because it requires integration of quantity related information in memory regardless of whether the focus is numerical or non-numerical magnitudes. The previous work has suggested an interplay between pre-existing semantic information about number-space relationship in processes of encoding and recall. Investigation of the compatibility between physical stimulus size - spatial position and false recognition may provide valuable information about the cognitive representation of non-numerical magnitudes. Therefore, we applied a false memory procedure to a series of non-numerical stimulus pairs. Three versions of the pairs were used: big-right (a big character on the right/a small character on the left), big-left (a big character on the left/a small character on the right), and equal-sized (an equal sized character on each side). In the first phase, participants (

Indexed as

accuracy of recallfalse memoryobject sizereaction timerecall biassignal detectionsize–space compatibility

Identifiers

PMID30154752
PMCPMC6102480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.