Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30154715›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2018

Advantages and Limitations of Current Techniques for Analyzing the Biodistribution of Nanoparticles.

Lauren Arms, Doug W Smith, Jamie Flynn, William Palmer, Antony Martin, Ameha Woldu, Susan Hua

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species (mROS) Generation and Cancer:International journal of nanomedicine · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren ArmsSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Doug W SmithSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Jamie FlynnSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
William PalmerHunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia.
Antony MartinHunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia.
Ameha WolduSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Susan HuaSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanomedicines are typically submicrometer-sized carrier materials (nanoparticles) encapsulating therapeutic and/or imaging compounds that are used for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of diseases. They are increasingly being used to overcome biological barriers in the body to improve the way we deliver compounds to specific tissues and organs. Nanomedicine technology aims to improve the balance between the efficacy and the toxicity of therapeutic compounds. Nanoparticles, one of the key technologies of nanomedicine, can exhibit a combination of physical, chemical and biological characteristics that determine their

Indexed as

advantagesbiodistributionimagingin vivolimitationsnanomedicinenanoparticlestechniques

Identifiers

PMID30154715
PMCPMC6102329
OpenAlexW2885328264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.