Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30154710›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2018

Uncertainpy: A Python Toolbox for Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis in Computational Neuroscience.

Simen Tennøe, Geir Halnes, Gaute T Einevoll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Toward Reference-Grade neuron models.Communications biology · 2026
    Article
  2. eFEL: electrophysiology feature extraction library.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Tutorial: using NEURON for neuromechanical simulations.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. VECMAtk: a scalable verification, validation and uncertainty quantification toolkit for scientific simulations.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Quantification of model and data uncertainty in a network analysis of cardiac myocyte mechanosignalling.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2020
    Article
  19. Quantification of uncertainty in a new network model of pulmonary arterial adventitial fibroblast pro-fibrotic signalling.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Simen TennøeCentre for Integrative Neuroplasticity, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Geir HalnesCentre for Integrative Neuroplasticity, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Gaute T EinevollCentre for Integrative Neuroplasticity, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational models in neuroscience typically contain many parameters that are poorly constrained by experimental data. Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis provide rigorous procedures to quantify how the model output depends on this parameter uncertainty. Unfortunately, the application of such methods is not yet standard within the field of neuroscience. Here we present Uncertainpy, an open-source Python toolbox, tailored to perform uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis of neuroscience models. Uncertainpy aims to make it quick and easy to get started with uncertainty analysis, without any need for detailed prior knowledge. The toolbox allows uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis to be performed on already existing models without needing to modify the model equations or model implementation. Uncertainpy bases its analysis on polynomial chaos expansions, which are more efficient than the more standard Monte-Carlo based approaches. Uncertainpy is tailored for neuroscience applications by its built-in capability for calculating characteristic features in the model output. The toolbox does not merely perform a point-to-point comparison of the "raw" model output (e.g., membrane voltage traces), but can also calculate the uncertainty and sensitivity of salient model response features such as spike timing, action potential width, average interspike interval, and other features relevant for various neural and neural network models. Uncertainpy comes with several common models and features built in, and including custom models and new features is easy. The aim of the current paper is to present Uncertainpy to the neuroscience community in a user-oriented manner. To demonstrate its broad applicability, we perform an uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis of three case studies relevant for neuroscience: the original Hodgkin-Huxley point-neuron model for action potential generation, a multi-compartmental model of a thalamic interneuron implemented in the NEURON simulator, and a sparsely connected recurrent network model implemented in the NEST simulator.

Indexed as

computational modelingfeaturespolynomial chaos expansionsPythonquasi-Monte Carlo methodsensitivity analysissoftwareuncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID30154710
PMCPMC6102374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.