Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30154222›Full record

ArticleGenome research2018

Polycomb repressive complex 1 shapes the nucleosome landscape but not accessibility at target genes.

Hamish W King, Nadezda A Fursova, Neil P Blackledge, Robert J Klose

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Polycomb-mediated 3D chromatin interactions in gene regulation.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Reduced histone gene copy number disruptsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hamish W KingDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5972-8926
Nadezda A FursovaDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9894-5958
Neil P BlackledgeDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom.
Robert J KloseDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8726-7888
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 098024/Z/11/ZWellcome Trust 099677/Z/12/ZWellcome Trust 209400/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are transcriptional repressors that play important roles in regulating gene expression during animal development. In vitro experiments have shown that PcG protein complexes can compact chromatin to limit the activity of chromatin remodeling enzymes and access of the transcriptional machinery to DNA. In fitting with these ideas, gene promoters associated with PcG proteins have been reported to be less accessible than other gene promoters. However, it remains largely untested in vivo whether PcG proteins define chromatin accessibility or other chromatin features. To address this important question, we examine the chromatin accessibility and nucleosome landscape at PcG protein-bound promoters in mouse embryonic stem cells using the assay for transposase accessible chromatin (ATAC)-seq. Combined with genetic ablation strategies, we unexpectedly discover that although PcG protein-occupied gene promoters exhibit reduced accessibility, this does not rely on PcG proteins. Instead, the Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) appears to play a unique role in driving elevated nucleosome occupancy and decreased nucleosomal spacing in Polycomb chromatin domains. Our new genome-scale observations argue, in contrast to the prevailing view, that PcG proteins do not significantly affect chromatin accessibility and highlight an underappreciated complexity in the relationship between chromatin accessibility, the nucleosome landscape, and PcG-mediated transcriptional repression.

Indexed as

Promoter Regions, GeneticAnimalsCells, CulturedGene Knockout TechniquesMiceMouse Embryonic Stem CellsNucleosomesPolycomb-Group ProteinsPolycomb Repressive Complex 1RNA Polymerase IISequence Analysis, RNANucleosomesPolycomb-Group ProteinsPolycomb Repressive Complex 1RNA Polymerase II

Identifiers

PMID30154222
PMCPMC6169895
OpenAlexW2952785979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.