ArticleBurns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries2018
Correlation between invasive and noninvasive blood pressure measurements in severely burned children.
Article in Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of a simulation-based implementation method to support the introduction of a new invasive device: a prospective cross-over study.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- Evaluation of a novel cuffless photoplethysmography-based wristband for measuring blood pressure according to the regulatory standards.European heart journal. Digital health · 2024Article
- Blood pressure monitoring following kidney transplantation in children: a comparison of invasive and noninvasive measurements using Doppler as a benchmark technique.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2023Observational
- Using pulmonary artery acceleration time to evaluate pulmonary hemodynamic changes on preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome.Translational pediatrics · 2021Article
- Intraoperative Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring in Flap-Based Breast Reconstruction: Does It Change Outcomes?Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2021Article
- Utility of Pulmonary Artery Acceleration Time to Estimate Systolic Pulmonary Artery Pressure in Neonates and Young Infants.Pediatric cardiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAccurate blood pressure monitoring is essential for burn management, with the intra-arterial line method being the gold standard. Here we evaluated agreement between cuff and intra-arterial line methods.
methodsData from burned children admitted from 1997 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Simultaneously collected intra-arterial and cuff measurements were cross-matched and linear regression performed to assess agreement for systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP).
resultsWe identified 9969 matches for SBP, DBP, and MAP in 872 patients (579 male) aged 8±5years with burns covering 52±20% of the total body surface area and a hospitalization lasting 33±31 days. Intra-arterial lines had a complication rate of 1%. The mean bias (95% CI) between methods was 1.3 (0.5, 2.1) mm Hg for SBP, -6.4 (-7.0, -5.7) mmHg for DBP, and -5.8 (-6.4, -5.3) mmHg for MAP. The standard deviation of the bias (95% limit of agreement) was 12.1 (-22.5, 25.1) mmHg for SBP, 9.9 (-25.8, 13.0) mmHg for DBP, and 8.7 (-22.8, 11.1) mmHg for MAP.
conclusionsCuff measurements vary widely from those of intra-arterial lines, which have a low complication rate. Intra-arterial lines are advisable when tight control of the hemodynamic response is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.