Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30153871›Full record

ArticlePsychological medicine2019

Identification and initial validation of empirically derived bipolar symptom states from a large longitudinal dataset: an application of hidden Markov modeling to the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD) study.

James J Prisciandaro, Bryan K Tolliver, Stacia M DeSantis

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Dynamics of data-driven microstates in bipolar disorder.Journal of psychiatric research · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James J PrisciandaroDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences,Medical University of SC,Charleston, SC,USA.
Bryan K TolliverDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences,Medical University of SC,Charleston, SC,USA.
Stacia M DeSantisSchool of Public Health,University of Texas Health Science Center,Houston, TX,USA.
Medical University of South Carolina · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

TREATMENT OF BIPOLAR DISORDER-278980001N01MH080001 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · 1998 to 2003
$5.3M
Imaging Framework for Testing GABAergic/glutamatergic Drugs in Bipolar AlcoholicsR01AA025365 · NIAAA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI PRISCIANDARO, JAMES JOSEPH · 2017 to 2022
$2.7M
Neuroimaging mechanisms of overlap between alcoholism and bipolar disorderK23AA020842 · NIAAA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI PRISCIANDARO, JAMES JOSEPH · 2012 to 2016
$835k
Robust Transition Models for the Analysis of Longitudinal Drinking OutcomesR03AA020648 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI BANDYOPADHYAY, DIPANKAR, DESANTIS, STACIA · 2011 to 2012
$160k
NIAAA NIH HHS K23 AA020842NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA025365NIAAA NIH HHS R03 AA020648NIMH NIH HHS N01 MH080001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough bipolar disorder (BD) is a fundamentally cyclical illness, a divided model of BD that emphasizes polarity over cyclicity has dominated modern psychiatric diagnostic systems since their advent in the 1980s. However, there has been a gradual return to conceptualizations of BD which focus on longitudinal course in the research community due to emerging supportive data. Advances in longitudinal statistical methods promise to further progress the field.

methodsThe current study employed hidden Markov modeling to uncover empirically derived manic and depressive states from longitudinal data [i.e. Young Mania Rating Scale and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale responses across five occasions from the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD) study], estimate participants' probabilities of transitioning between these states over time (n = 3918), and evaluate whether clinical variables (e.g. rapid cycling and substance dependence) predict participants' state transitions (n = 3229).

resultsAnalyses identified three empirically derived mood states ('euthymic,' 'depressed,' and 'mixed'). Relative to the euthymic and depressed states, the mixed state was less commonly experienced, more temporally unstable, and uniquely associated with rapid cycling, substance use, and psychosis. Individuals assigned to the mixed state at baseline were relatively less likely to be diagnosed with BD-II (v. BD-I), more likely to present with a mixed or (hypo)manic episode, and reported experiencing irritable and elevated mood more frequently.

conclusionsThe results from the current study represent an important step in defining, and characterizing the longitudinal course of, empirically derived mood states that can be used to form the foundation of objective, empirical attempts to define meaningful subtypes of affective illness defined by clinical course.

Indexed as

Markov ChainsTreatment OutcomeAcademic Medical CentersAdultAffectBipolar DisorderDatasets as TopicFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsUnited StatesBipolar disorderhidden Markov modellatent variable modelinglongitudinalmixed episodemixed featuressystematic treatment enhancement program for bipolar disorder

Identifiers

PMID30153871
PMCPMC7160825
OpenAlexW2889109457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.