Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30153864›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical case reports2018

Prenatal diagnosis and implications of microphthalmia and anophthalmia with a review of current ultrasound guidelines: two case reports.

A Searle, P Shetty, S J Melov, T I Alahakoon

Open access · goldAbstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical case reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genetic Disorders Detectable by Fetal MRI: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Congenital Microphthalmia with Orbital Cyst: A Case Series.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A SearleWestmead Institute for Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Corner Hawkesbury Road and Darcy Road, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia. Adrienne.W.Searle@gmail.com.
P ShettyWestmead Institute for Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Corner Hawkesbury Road and Darcy Road, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia.
S J MelovWestmead Institute for Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Corner Hawkesbury Road and Darcy Road, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia.
T I AlahakoonWestmead Institute for Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Corner Hawkesbury Road and Darcy Road, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia.
Westmead Hospital · AUThe University of Sydney · AUWestmead Institute · AU

Funding

Westmead Hospital Fetal Maternal Medicine Department n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrophthalmia and anophthalmia are rare congenital fetal abnormalities. The combined incidence is estimated at 1 in 10,000 births. These two conditions arise from complex and incompletely understood genetic and/or environmental causes. Prenatal diagnosis is neither frequent nor easy and relies on precise, high-quality ultrasonography. Current antenatal ultrasound protocols for imaging of the fetal eye are inconsistent and inadequate to screen for the spectrum of ocular malformations, and there are no clear guidelines on detection of these rare abnormalities. Our study of two cases highlights the importance of early detection, and we review current practice and suggest a definitive fetal imaging protocol. CASE PRESENTATION: We present two antenatal cases, one each of microphthalmia and anophthalmia, both diagnosed at the morphology scan at our tertiary fetal medicine unit. In both cases, the parents (a 36-year-old woman of Mauritanian ethnicity and a non-consanguineous partner of Nepalese descent, and a 31-year-old Caucasian woman and non-consanguineous Caucasian partner) elected to terminate their pregnancies and made unremarkable recoveries. Subsequent fetal autopsy confirmed the ultrasound scan findings.

conclusionsWe recommend that antenatal ultrasound guidelines are updated to specify use of a curvilinear transducer (2-9 MHz) to image both orbits in the axial and coronal planes, aided by use of a transvaginal probe when the transabdominal approach is inadequate to generate these images. When applicable, three-dimensional reverse-face imaging should be obtained to aid the diagnosis. The presence, absence, or non-visualization of lenses and hyaloid arteries should be documented in reports and these cases referred for a tertiary-level ultrasound scan and fetal medicine review. Imaging of the orbits should occur from 12 weeks' gestation. Magnetic resonance imaging and amniocentesis with chromosome microarray testing may provide additional genetic and structural information that may affect the overall morbidity associated with a diagnosis of microphthalmia or anophthalmia.

Indexed as

AdultAnophthalmosFemaleGenetic CounselingHumansMaleMicrophthalmosPregnancyUltrasonography, PrenatalAnophthalmiaAnophthalmosGuidelinesMicrophthalmiaMicrophthalmosUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID30153864
PMCPMC6114735
OpenAlexW2888875018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.