ReviewJournal of medical case reports2018
Prenatal diagnosis and implications of microphthalmia and anophthalmia with a review of current ultrasound guidelines: two case reports.
Review in Journal of medical case reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Genetic Disorders Detectable by Fetal MRI: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Patient-specific finite element analysis of orbital biomechanical responses to malpositioned self-inflating hydrogel implants in congenital microphthalmia.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Fraser Syndrome: A Narrative Review Based on a Case from Vietnam and the Past 20 Years of Research.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Sonographic diagnosis of fetal eye anomalies and their association with syndromal diseases: A retrospective multicenter analysis of 264 cases.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Management of anophthalmia, microphthalmia and coloboma in the newborn, shared care between neonatologist and ophthalmologist: a literature review.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2025Review
- Prevalence of Congenital Ocular Anomalies in 15 Countries of Europe: Results From the Medikeye Study.Birth defects research · 2024Article
- A naturally occurring canine model of syndromic congenital microphthalmia.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Article
- Pediatric orbital lesions: ocular pathologies.Pediatric radiology · 2024Article
- Efficacy of Systematic Early-Second-Trimester Ultrasound Screening for Facial Anomalies: A Comparison between Prenatal Ultrasound and Postmortem Findings.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- The growth and shape of the eyeball and crystalline lens in utero documented by fetal MR imaging.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Clinical Congenital Anophthalmos and Microphthalmos-Experiences of Patients and Their Parents after More than 10 Years of Treatment.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Dimensions of the optic chiasm: quantitative ultrasound comparison between fetuses with anophthalmia/microphthalmia and normal fetuses.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021Article
- Prenatal diagnosis of isolated bilateral anophthalmia.BMJ case reports · 2021Article
- Prenatal diagnosis of bilateral congenital microphthalmia in two fetuses from the same parents.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2020Article
- Congenital Microphthalmia with Orbital Cyst: A Case Series.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMicrophthalmia and anophthalmia are rare congenital fetal abnormalities. The combined incidence is estimated at 1 in 10,000 births. These two conditions arise from complex and incompletely understood genetic and/or environmental causes. Prenatal diagnosis is neither frequent nor easy and relies on precise, high-quality ultrasonography. Current antenatal ultrasound protocols for imaging of the fetal eye are inconsistent and inadequate to screen for the spectrum of ocular malformations, and there are no clear guidelines on detection of these rare abnormalities. Our study of two cases highlights the importance of early detection, and we review current practice and suggest a definitive fetal imaging protocol. CASE PRESENTATION: We present two antenatal cases, one each of microphthalmia and anophthalmia, both diagnosed at the morphology scan at our tertiary fetal medicine unit. In both cases, the parents (a 36-year-old woman of Mauritanian ethnicity and a non-consanguineous partner of Nepalese descent, and a 31-year-old Caucasian woman and non-consanguineous Caucasian partner) elected to terminate their pregnancies and made unremarkable recoveries. Subsequent fetal autopsy confirmed the ultrasound scan findings.
conclusionsWe recommend that antenatal ultrasound guidelines are updated to specify use of a curvilinear transducer (2-9 MHz) to image both orbits in the axial and coronal planes, aided by use of a transvaginal probe when the transabdominal approach is inadequate to generate these images. When applicable, three-dimensional reverse-face imaging should be obtained to aid the diagnosis. The presence, absence, or non-visualization of lenses and hyaloid arteries should be documented in reports and these cases referred for a tertiary-level ultrasound scan and fetal medicine review. Imaging of the orbits should occur from 12 weeks' gestation. Magnetic resonance imaging and amniocentesis with chromosome microarray testing may provide additional genetic and structural information that may affect the overall morbidity associated with a diagnosis of microphthalmia or anophthalmia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.