Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30153844›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic pathology2018

Automatic evaluation of tumor budding in immunohistochemically stained colorectal carcinomas and correlation to clinical outcome.

Cleo-Aron Weis, Jakob Nikolas Kather, Susanne Melchers, Hanaa Al-Ahmdi, Marion J Pollheimer, Cord Langner, Timo Gaiser

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic pathology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Distance-based evaluation of tumor budding in colorectal cancer.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Predictive value of tumor budding in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: an update.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Detection of Ferroptosis by Immunohistochemistry and Immunofluorescence.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Tumour budding in solid cancers.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Cleo-Aron WeisInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, 68167, Mannheim, Germany. cleo-aron.weis@medma.uni-heidelberg.de.
Jakob Nikolas KatherDepartment of Medical Oncology and Internal Medicine VI, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Susanne MelchersDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Hanaa Al-AhmdiInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Marion J PollheimerInstitute of Pathology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Cord LangnerInstitute of Pathology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Timo GaiserInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEMedical University of Graz · ATUniversity Medical Centre Mannheim · DENational Center for Tumor Diseases · DE

Funding

Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University SEED fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTumor budding, meaning a detachment of tumor cells at the invasion front of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) into single cells or clusters (<=5 tumor cells), has been shown to correlate to an inferior clinical outcome by several independent studies. Therefore, it has been discussed as a complementary prognostic factor to the TNM staging system, and it is already included in national guidelines as an additional prognostic parameter. However, its application by manual evaluation in routine pathology is hampered due to the use of several slightly different assessment systems, a time-consuming manual counting process and a high inter-observer variability. Hence, we established and validated an automatic image processing approach to reliably quantify tumor budding in immunohistochemically (IHC) stained sections of CRC samples.

methodsThis approach combines classical segmentation methods (like morphological operations) and machine learning techniques (k-means and hierarchical clustering, convolutional neural networks) to reliably detect tumor buds in colorectal carcinoma samples immunohistochemically stained for pan-cytokeratin. As a possible application, we tested it on whole-slide images as well as on tissue microarrays (TMA) from a clinically well-annotated CRC cohort.

resultsOur automatic tumor budding evaluation tool detected the absolute number of tumor buds per image with a very good correlation to the manually segmented ground truth (R2 value of 0.86). Furthermore the automatic evaluation of whole-slide images from 20 CRC-patients, we found that neither the detected number of tumor buds at the invasion front nor the number in hotspots was associated with the nodal status. However, the number of spatial clusters of tumor buds (budding hotspots) significantly correlated to the nodal status (p-value = 0.003 for N0 vs. N1/N2). TMAs were not feasible for tumor budding evaluation, as the spatial relationship of tumor buds (especially hotspots) was not preserved.

conclusionsAutomatic image processing is a feasible and valid assessment tool for tumor budding in CRC on whole-slide images. Interestingly, only the spatial clustering of the tumor buds in hotspots (and especially the number of hotspots) and not the absolute number of tumor buds showed a clinically relevant correlation with patient outcome in our data.

Indexed as

Cell AdhesionCell MovementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImmunohistochemistryAgedAutomation, LaboratoryBiomarkers, TumorCluster AnalysisColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansKeratinsMachine LearningMaleNeoplasm InvasivenessNeural Networks, ComputerBiomarkers, TumorKeratinsColorectal carcinomaConvolutional neural networkDigital pathologyImage processingTumor budding

Identifiers

PMID30153844
PMCPMC6114534
OpenAlexW2888793802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.