Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30153814›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2018

Self-perceived ability to cope with stress and depressive mood without smoking predicts successful smoking cessation 12 months later in a quitline setting: a secondary analysis of a randomized trial.

Eva Nohlert, John Öhrvik, Ásgeir R Helgason

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02085616 (Smoking Cessation by Telephone. Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Proactive and Reactive Services at the Swedish National Tobacco Quitline), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02085616 naterminatednot on this map

Smoking Cessation by Telephone. Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Proactive and Reactive Services at the Swedish National Tobacco Quitline (SNTQ).

TypeinterventionalSponsorUppsala UniversityRan2009 to 2011Enrolled586ConditionsSmoking Cessation, Tobacco CessationArmsProactive service, Reactive service
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Perceived Stress and Smoking Cessation: The Role of Smoking Urges.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Associations between depression, stress, and e-cigarette use among OEF/OIF veterans.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eva NohlertCentre for Clinical Research, Uppsala University, Hospital of Vastmanland Vasteras, 721 89, Vasteras, Sweden. eva.nohlert@regionvastmanland.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1771-4635
John ÖhrvikCentre for Clinical Research, Uppsala University, Hospital of Vastmanland Vasteras, 721 89, Vasteras, Sweden.
Ásgeir R HelgasonDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Social Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelephone-based smoking cessation services ('quitlines') are both effective and cost-effective. Knowledge of modifiable baseline factors in real-life settings with heterogeneous participants is essential for the development and improvement of treatment protocols to assist in telephone-based smoking cessation. The aim was to assess if self-perceived abilities to cope measured at baseline, would predict abstinence at the 12-month follow-up at the Swedish National Tobacco Quitline (SNTQ).

methodsThe data were retrieved from a previous randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of proactive and reactive service at the SNTQ. Included were 612 clients calling the SNTQ between February 2009 and September 2010. Outcome measures were self-reported point prevalence and 6-month continuous abstinence at the 12-month follow-up. Plausible predictors of smoking cessation were assessed at the first call and in a baseline questionnaire. Self-perceived abilities at baseline were measured by two questions: (1) How likely is it that you will be smoke-free in one year? and (2) How likely are you to be able to handle stress and depressive mood without smoking? The associations between potential predictors and outcome (smoke-free at 12-month follow-up) were assessed by logistic regression analysis.

resultsOf the two potential predictors for abstinence at 12-month follow-up, only the perceived ability to handle stress and depressive mood without smoking remained significant in the adjusted analyses (Odds Ratio, OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.00-1.27 for point prevalence and OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01-1.33 for 6-month continuous abstinence according to intention-to-treat). The overall strongest predictor in the adjusted analyses was smoking status in the week before baseline (OR 3.30, 95% CI 1.79-6.09 for point prevalence and OR 3.97, 95% CI 2.01-7.83 for 6-month continuous abstinence).

conclusionsThe perceived ability to handle stress and depressive mood without smoking at baseline predicted the subjects' abstinence at the 12-month follow-up. An assessment of/adjustment for stress and depressive mood coping skills may be appropriate in future smoking cessation treatment and research. The treatment protocol can be tailored to individual differences and needs for optimal support.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02085616 . Registered March 10, 2014, 'retrospectively registered'.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalSelf ConceptAdultAgedDepressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedSmokingSmoking CessationStress, PsychologicalSwedenTelephone6-month continuous abstinenceDepressive moodPoint prevalenceSelf-efficacySelf-perceived abilitiesSingle-item assessmentTobacco

Identifiers

PMID30153814
PMCPMC6114486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.