Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30153341›Full record

Trial reportHematological oncology2019

Treatment of mucosa associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma with a long-term once-weekly regimen of oral azithromycin: Results from the phase II MALT-A trial.

Heimo Lagler, Barbara Kiesewetter, Werner Dolak, Markus Obermueller, Ingrid Simonitsch-Klupp, Julius Lukas, Ortrun Neuper, Wolfgang W Lamm, Marius E Mayerhoefer, Markus Raderer

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Hematological oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. [Research Progress of Pulmonary Extranodal Marginal Zone Lymphoma].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heimo LaglerDepartment of Medicine 1, Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3240-7385
Barbara KiesewetterDepartment of Medicine 1, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5490-2371
Werner DolakDepartment of Medicine III, Clinical Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology1, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Markus ObermuellerDepartment of Medicine 1, Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ingrid Simonitsch-KluppDepartment of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Julius LukasDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ortrun NeuperDepartment of Medicine 1, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Wolfgang W LammDepartment of Medicine 1, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Marius E MayerhoeferDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Markus RadererDepartment of Medicine 1, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The macrolide clarithromycin has been reported as active for therapy of mucosa associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. Pharmacokinetic properties, however, require continuous daily intake over a prolonged period of time. As the macrolide azithromycin is characterized by a long half-life as well as potential antineoplastic activity in vitro, we have performed a phase II trial of long-term once-weekly oral azithromycin for treatment of MALT lymphoma. In a 2-stage-design, 16 patients (10 f/6 m) with histologically verified and measurable MALT lymphoma were included in the first phase of the trial, which could be expanded to a maximum of 46 patients depending on remissions in the first phase. Patients were given oral azithromycin 1500 mg once-weekly 4 times a month, and restaging was performed after 3 and 6 months. Two patients had gastric and 14 extragastric MALT lymphoma; 12/16 patients were treatment-naive and received azithromycin as first line treatment. Tolerance of this regimen was excellent, and 14/16 patients received 6 months of treatment as scheduled, while 1 patient each discontinued after 4 (progressive disease) and 1 cycle (personal reasons), respectively. The most commonly observed side effects were mild nausea (n = 8) and diarrhea (n = 4). Efficacy, however, was low as only 4/16 patients (25%) responded, with 2 complete and 2 partial remissions, 9 patients (56%) had stable disease, and 3 patients 19%) were rated as progressive disease. As the predefined activity of more than 7/16 patients responding was not reached, the study was stopped after 16 patients. Although long-term once-weekly oral azithromycin showed some antilymphoma activity, the response rate was below the predefined threshold of interest. However, based on our data, one cannot rule out suboptimal dosing in our study; attempts to study azithromycin at a different mode of application might be warranted in the future.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsAzithromycinDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansLymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal ZoneMaleMiddle AgedRetreatmentTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsAzithromycinazithromycinclinical trialMALT lymphoma

Identifiers

PMID30153341
PMCPMC6585850
OpenAlexW2889362881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.