Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30153325›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2018

Patient and Caregiver Perspectives on Managing Multiple Health Conditions.

Catherine Riffin, Peter H Van Ness, Lynne Iannone, Terri Fried

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Characterizing Caregiver Roles and Conflict in Health Management Support to Older People With Multiple Chronic Conditions.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Catherine RiffinDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Yale University New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0002-2361-3083
Peter H Van NessDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Yale University New Haven, Connecticut.
Lynne IannoneVeterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut.
Terri FriedDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Yale University New Haven, Connecticut.

Funding

Yale Study Support Suite (YES3): Dashboard and Web Portal Software Supporting Research Workflow through integrated, customizable REDCap External ModulesP30AG021342 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Albert C Shaw · 2002 to 2026
$37.9M
Yale Training Program in Geriatric Clinical Epidemiology and Aging-Related ResearchT32AG019134 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Terri R. Fried · 2001 to 2026
$7.5M
GENETICS OF REPRODUCTIVE LONGEVITY IN DROSOPHILAR01AG001934 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI HIRAIZUMI, YUICHIRO · 1985 to 1987
–
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021342NIA NIH HHS P30AG021342NIA NIH HHS T32 AG019134NIA NIH HHS T32AG1934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore patient and caregiver experiences, preferences, and attitudes toward the provision and receipt of caregiving assistance with medical tasks.

designQualitative study consisting of in-depth interviews with 20 patient-caregiver dyads.

settingCommunity and academic-affiliated primary care clinics.

participantsIndividuals aged 65 or older with 2 or more health conditions and their family caregivers (n=20 patient-caregiver dyads). MEASUREMENTS: Open-ended questions were asked about the tasks that the patient and caregiver performed to manage the patient's health conditions; questions were designed to elicit participant reactions and attitudes toward the help they provided or received. Transcripts were analyzed using the constant comparative method.

resultsParticipant preferences and attitudes toward the receipt and provision of disease management tasks were highly personal. Participant responses clustered into 2 caregiving typologies: supportive caregiving relationships and conflicted caregiving relationships. Supportive relationships were characterized by patient-caregiver agreement about caregiver level of involvement, agreement about one another's competency to perform disease-related tasks, mutual understanding, collaborative decision-making and disease management, and use of family and formal caregiving. Conflicted relationships were characterized by disagreement about caregiver level of involvement, disagreement about one another's competency to perform disease management tasks, underappreciation of one another's experiences, disagreement over decision-making and disease management, and use of formal caregiving.

conclusionsThe views that patient-caregiver dyads expressed in this study illustrate the varied preferences and attitudes toward caregiving assistance with multiple health conditions. These findings support a dyadic approach to evaluating and addressing patient and caregiver needs and attitudes toward provision of assistance.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Chronic ConditionsQualitative ResearchSocial Support

Identifiers

PMID30153325
PMCPMC6710828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.