Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30153282›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

The musculoskeletal consequences of latissmus dorsi breast reconstruction in women following mastectomy for breast cancer.

Nicole E Blackburn, Joseph G Mc Veigh, Eilis M Mc Caughan, Richard D Kennedy, Stuart A McIntosh, Iseult M Wilson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05388240 (Mobile App for Shoulder Rehabilitation Following Breast Reconstruction), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05388240 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Mobile App for Shoulder Rehabilitation Following Breast Reconstruction: A Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of SaskatchewanRan2022 to 2023Enrolled22ConditionsShoulder Dysfunction, Breast ReconstructionArmsEducation via a Mobile App, Education and Exercise via a Mobile App
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The role of physical arm function and demographic disparities in breast cancer survivors' ability to return to work.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicole E BlackburnCentre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4379-6312
Joseph G Mc VeighSchool of Clinical Therapies, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Eilis M Mc CaughanInstitute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Coleraine, United Kingdom.
Richard D KennedySchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Stuart A McIntoshSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Iseult M WilsonCentre for Health and Rehabilitation Technologies, Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Jordanstown, United Kingdom.
Queen's University Belfast · GBUniversity of Ulster · GBUniversity College Cork · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCurrent evidence suggests that patients who have latissimus dorsi (LD) breast reconstruction following mastectomy for breast cancer can experience long-term shoulder dysfunction. However, as there is no standardised assessment or follow-up period within the literature, findings are conflicting. This research aimed to investigate the impact on daily living of immediate and delayed LD breast reconstruction in women following mastectomy for breast cancer.

methodsBoth qualitative and quantitative methods of enquiry were used. A focus group study explored the musculoskeletal consequences of surgery as perceived by the women (n = 15) and their healthcare professionals (n = 11). A questionnaire survey was administered (n = 159), including a range of outcome measures to quantify both the physical and psychosocial impact of LD breast reconstruction. Dyad interviews were also conducted in order to determine the impact of surgery on function and activities of daily living (ADL) from the woman's perspective and that of her significant other (n = 8).

resultsThe qualitative studies highlighted a lack of preparedness and unrealistic expectations regarding functional recovery among women and their significant others'. Post-surgery it was apparent that women weighed up reduced shoulder function against survival, demonstrating resilience in their approach to coping with this adaptive way of living. The survey identified low to moderate effect on the outcomes assessed (n = 159), however, node removal significantly impacted certain aspects of quality of life (p<0.05) and disability (p = 0.04).

conclusionsBreast reconstruction using the LD had an impact on shoulder function and some ADL, which impacted not only on the women but also family and significant others. Despite the functional implications associated with surgery, findings would suggest that shoulder dysfunction is not their main concern. This work identified that women and their significant other require further information to clarify expectation regarding recovery, highlighting the changing priorities of women throughout their journey from diagnosis into long-term recovery.

Indexed as

MammaplastyAgedBreast NeoplasmsHumansMastectomyMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRecovery of FunctionSuperficial Back MusclesSurveys and QuestionnairesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID30153282
PMCPMC6112655
OpenAlexW2889102813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.