Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30153277›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Large mammal declines and the incipient loss of mammal-bird mutualisms in an African savanna ecosystem.

Nathan Diplock, Kate Johnston, Antoine Mellon, Laura Mitchell, Madison Moore, Daniel Schneider, Alyssa Taylor, Jess Whitney, Kera Zegar, John Kioko and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Perceived costs as drivers of wildlife management preferences in rural Tanzanian communities.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nathan DiplockCenter for Wildlife Management Studies, The School for Field Studies, Karatu, Tanzania.
Kate JohnstonDepartment of Biology, Augsburg University, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Antoine MellonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
Laura MitchellDepartment of Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2163-9909
Madison MooreDepartment of Biological Foundations of Behavior, Franklin and Marshall College, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Daniel SchneiderDepartment of Environmental Science, Muhlenberg College, Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Alyssa TaylorDepartment of Biology, Elizabethtown College, Elizabethtown, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Jess WhitneyDepartment of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Kera ZegarCollege of the Environment, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
John KiokoCenter for Wildlife Management Studies, The School for Field Studies, Karatu, Tanzania.
Christian KiffnerCenter for Wildlife Management Studies, The School for Field Studies, Karatu, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0002-7475-9023

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past half-century, large mammal populations have declined substantially throughout East Africa, mainly due to habitat loss and unsustainable direct exploitation. While it has been acknowledged that the loss of large mammals can have direct and cascading effects on community composition and ecosystem characteristics, limited quantitative work has been done on how declines of large herbivore populations impacts the abundance of mutualistic symbionts. Using a space-for-time observational approach, we quantified the large mammal community alongside the densities, host preferences and behaviors of mutualistic red-billed oxpeckers (Buphagus erythrorhynchus), and yellow-billed oxpeckers (Buphagus africanus) in northern Tanzania. At the landscape scale, mammal community composition was substantially less diverse in highly human-dominated areas when compared with more protected areas, with an observed complete loss of large wild mammal species in two study areas. Mirroring this trend, oxpecker densities were lowest in the least protected areas, and highest in fully protected areas. Using resource selection functions implemented via generalized linear models at different scales, we found that oxpeckers (1) were predominantly (67% of red-billed oxpeckers; 70% of yellow-billed oxpeckers) feeding on larger (between 500kg and 1500kg) ungulate host species within the mammal community, (2) usually preferred feeding on larger individuals (adults and males) within a specific host species population, and (3) preferred hosts that were more tolerant of their presence. In particular, cattle were especially intolerant of oxpecker presence and were relatively effective in displacing oxpeckers. We found little evidence that oxpecker feeding was parasitic across all host species; wound feeding was only observed on giraffe, comprising 6% and 4% of feeding behavior in red-billed and yellow-billed oxpeckers respectively. Thus, a loss of large-bodied and oxpecker tolerant host species is a likely explanation for declines of oxpecker populations in human dominated landscapes, which may have further cascading effects.

Indexed as

BirdsEcosystemMammalsAnimalsGrasslandHumansSymbiosisTanzania

Identifiers

PMID30153277
PMCPMC6112642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.