Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30153249›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2018

The memory for time and space differentially engages the proximal and distal parts of the hippocampal subfields CA1 and CA3.

Zachery Beer, Peter Vavra, Erika Atucha, Katja Rentzing, Hans-Jochen Heinze, Magdalena M Sauvage

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Parallel processing streams in the hippocampus.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Potential factors influencing replay across CA1 during sharp-wave ripples.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zachery BeerMercator Research Group, Functional Architecture of Memory Unit, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany.
Peter VavraOtto von Guericke University, Medical Faculty, Functional Neuroplasticity Department, Magdeburg, Germany.
Erika AtuchaLeibniz-Institute for Neurobiology, Functional Architecture of Memory Department, Center for Learning and Memory, Magdeburg, Germany.
Katja RentzingMercator Research Group, Functional Architecture of Memory Unit, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany.
Hans-Jochen HeinzeOtto von Guericke University, Neurology Department, Magdeburg, Germany.
Magdalena M SauvageMercator Research Group, Functional Architecture of Memory Unit, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A well-accepted model of episodic memory involves the processing of spatial and non-spatial information by segregated pathways and their association within the hippocampus. However, these pathways project to distinct proximodistal levels of the hippocampus. Moreover, spatial and non-spatial subnetworks segregated along this axis have been recently described using memory tasks with either a spatial or a non-spatial salient dimension. Here, we tested whether the concept of segregated subnetworks and the traditional model are reconcilable by studying whether activity within CA1 and CA3 remains segregated when both dimensions are salient, as is the case for episodes. Simultaneously, we investigated whether temporal or spatial information bound to objects recruits similar subnetworks as items or locations per se, respectively. To do so, we studied the correlations between brain activity and spatial and/or temporal discrimination ratios in proximal and distal CA1 and CA3 by detecting Arc RNA in mice. We report a robust proximodistal segregation in CA1 for temporal information processing and in both CA1 and CA3 for spatial information processing. Our results suggest that the traditional model of episodic memory and the concept of segregated networks are reconcilable, to a large extent and put forward distal CA1 as a possible "home" location for time cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsCA1 Region, HippocampalCA3 Region, HippocampalHippocampusMaleMemoryMiceMice, Inbred C57BLSpatial ProcessingTemporal Lobe

Identifiers

PMID30153249
PMCPMC6136809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.