Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30153044›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2018

Prehospital Care and Emergency Department Door-to-Antibiotic Time in Sepsis.

Ithan D Peltan, Kristina H Mitchell, Kristina E Rudd, Blake A Mann, David J Carlbom, Thomas D Rea, Allison M Butler, Catherine L Hough, Samuel M Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Septic shock in the prehospital setting: a scoping review.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. [Sepsis in out-of-hospital emergency medicine].Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. [Consensus document for sepsis code implementation and development in the Community of Madrid].Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2019
    Article
  15. Update in Critical Care and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome 2018.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ithan D Peltan1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center and University of Utah School of Medicine, Murray, Utah.ORCID 0000-0003-1730-234X
Kristina H Mitchell2 Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, and.
Kristina E Rudd2 Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, and.ORCID 0000-0002-6695-8401
Blake A Mann2 Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, and.
David J Carlbom2 Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, and.
Thomas D Rea4 Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Allison M Butler5 Statistical Data Center, Intermountain Healthcare, Murray, Utah.
Catherine L Hough2 Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, and.
Samuel M Brown1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center and University of Utah School of Medicine, Murray, Utah.ORCID 0000-0003-1206-6261
SleepMed · USUniversity of Utah · USIntermountain Healthcare · USUniversity of Washington · USVirginia Mason Medical Center · US

Funding

Transform Dissemination and Implementation Science in CTSA ProgramsUL1TR002319 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI John K. Amory · 2017 to 2026
$100.0M
Institute of Translational Health SciencesUL1TR000423 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2012 to 2016
$49.4M
RESPIRATORY RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32HL007287 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Kristina Anne Crothers, David J. Horne · 1985 to 2026
$16.7M
RESEARCH TRAINING IN RENAL DISEASET32DK007467 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BANSAL, NISHA, KESTENBAUM, BRYAN R · 1986 to 2023
$5.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000423NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002319NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007287NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007467
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleEarly antibiotics improve outcomes for patients with sepsis. Factors influencing antibiotic timing in emergency department (ED) sepsis remain unclear.

objectivesDetermine the relationship between prehospital level of care of patients with sepsis and ED door-to-antibiotic time.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study comprised patients admitted from the community to an academic ED June 2009 to February 2015 with fluid-refractory sepsis or septic shock. Transfer patients and those whose antibiotics began before ED arrival or after ED discharge were excluded. We used multivariable regression to evaluate the association between the time from ED arrival to antibiotic initiation and prehospital level of care, defined as the highest level of emergency medical services received: none, basic life support (BLS) ambulance, or advanced life support (ALS) ambulance. We measured variation in this association when hypotension was or was not present by ED arrival.

resultsAmong 361 community-dwelling patients with sepsis, the level of prehospital care correlated with illness severity. ALS-treated patients received antibiotics faster than patients who did not receive prehospital care (median, 103 [interquartile range, 75 to 135] vs. 144 [98 to 251] minutes, respectively) or BLS-only patients (168 [100-250] minutes; P < 0.001 for each pairwise comparison with ALS). This pattern persisted after multivariable adjustment, where ALS care (-43 min; 95% confidence interval [CI], -84 to -2; P = 0.033) but not BLS-only care (-4 min; 95% CI, -41 to +34; P = 0.97) was associated with less antibiotic delay compared with no prehospital care. ALS-treated patients more frequently received antibiotics within 3 hours of ED arrival (91%) compared with walk-in patients (62%; adjusted odds ratio, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.20 to 8.03; P = 0.015) or BLS-treated patients (56%; adjusted odds ratio, 4.51; 95% CI, 1.89 to 11.35; P < 0.001). ALS-treated patients started antibiotics faster than walk-in patients in the absence of hypotension by ED arrival (-41 min; 95% CI, -110 to -13; P = 0.009) but not when hypotension was present (+25 min; 95% CI, -43 to +92; P = 0.66).

conclusionsPrehospital ALS but not BLS-only care was associated with faster antibiotic initiation for patients with sepsis without hypotension. Process redesign for non-ALS patients may improve antibiotic timeliness for ED sepsis.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesEmergency Service, HospitalTime-to-TreatmentAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleHumansLife Support CareMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSepsisAnti-Bacterial Agentsambulance careemergency medical servicesemergency medicinesepsisseptic shock

Identifiers

PMID30153044
PMCPMC6322022
OpenAlexW2888862050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.