Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30152866›Full record

ArticleLetters in applied microbiology2018

Evaluation of ultraviolet-C and spray-drying processes as two independent inactivation steps on enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88 and K99 strains inoculated in fresh unconcentrated porcine plasma.

E Blázquez, C Rodríguez, J Ródenas, A Pérez de Rozas, J M Campbell, J Segalés, J Pujols, J Polo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Letters in applied microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

E BlázquezAPC EUROPE, S.L.U. Avda, Granollers, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8115-3225
C RodríguezAPC EUROPE, S.L.U. Avda, Granollers, Spain.
J RódenasAPC EUROPE, S.L.U. Avda, Granollers, Spain.
A Pérez de RozasIRTA, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA, IRTA-UAB), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
J M CampbellAPC Inc., Ankeny, IA, USA.
J SegalésDepartament de Sanitat i Anatomia Animals, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
J PujolsIRTA, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA, IRTA-UAB), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
J PoloAPC EUROPE, S.L.U. Avda, Granollers, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0990-2230
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESAPC Europe (Spain) · ESIowa Soybean Association · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to assess the effectiveness of an ultraviolet (UV-C, 254 nm) irradiation system and the spray-drying method as two independent safety steps on inactivation of Escherichia coli K88 and K99 spiked in porcine plasma at 6·46 ± 0·04 log SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The safety of raw materials from animal origin such as spray-dried porcine plasma (SDPP) may be a concern for the swine industry. Ultraviolet treatment at 254 nm (UV-C) of liquid plasma has been proposed as an additional biosafety feature in the manufacturing process of SDPP. We found that UV-C exposure in the liquid plasma at 3000 J l

Indexed as

Ultraviolet RaysAnimal FeedAnimalsDesiccationEnterotoxigenic Escherichia coliPlasmaSwineSwine Diseasesblood derivativesEscherichia coliporcine plasmaspray-dryingultraviolet irradiation

Identifiers

PMID30152866
PMCPMC7165488
OpenAlexW2889153311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.