Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30152307›Full record

ArticleInfection control and hospital epidemiology2018

Comparison of nylon-flocked swab and cellulose sponge methods for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and gram-negative organism recovery from high-touch surfaces in patient rooms.

Clare Rock, Michael Anderson, Shawna Lewis, Verna Scheeler, Elaine Nowakowski, Yea-Jen Hsu, Aaron M Milstone, Karen C Carroll, Lisa L Maragakis, Patricia J Simner and 1 more

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Clare Rock1Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,Baltimore,Maryland.
Michael Anderson1Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,Baltimore,Maryland.
Shawna Lewis1Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,Baltimore,Maryland.
Verna Scheeler1Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,Baltimore,Maryland.
Elaine Nowakowski3Department of Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control,The Johns Hopkins Hospital,Baltimore,Maryland.
Yea-Jen Hsu4Health Policy and Management,Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,Baltimore,Maryland.
Aaron M Milstone1Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,Baltimore,Maryland.
Karen C Carroll1Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,Baltimore,Maryland.
Lisa L Maragakis1Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,Baltimore,Maryland.
Patricia J Simner1Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,Baltimore,Maryland.
CDC Prevention Epicenters Program

Funding

Real-Time Whole Genome Sequencing Analysis of Carbapenemase-Producing Organisms in the Non-Outbreak Hospital SettingR21AI130608 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SIMNER, PATRICIA · 2017 to 2018
$449k
NCEZID CDC HHS U54 CK000447NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI130608
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ideal sampling method and benefit of qualitative versus quantitative culture for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) recovery in hospitalized patient rooms and bathrooms is unknown. Although the use of nylon-flocked swabs improved overall gram-negative organism recovery compared with cellulose sponges, they were similar for CRE recovery. Quantitative culture was inferior and unrevealing beyond the qualitative results.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEnvironmental MicrobiologyBacteriological TechniquesBaltimoreCarbapenem-Resistant EnterobacteriaceaeCulture MediaPatients' RoomsProspective StudiesSpecimen HandlingTertiary Care CentersCulture Media

Identifiers

PMID30152307
PMCPMC6619416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.