ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2018
Sampling depth of a diffuse reflectance spectroscopy probe for in-vivo physiological quantification of murine subcutaneous tumor allografts.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enabling point of care optical diagnostics and treatment of oral lesions in resource-limited settings: Preclinical development and evaluation of a low-cost theranostic intraoral device for image-guided photodynamic therapy.Biophotonics discovery · 2025Article
- Quantitative estimation of optical properties in bilayer media within the subdiffusive regime using tilted fiber-optic probe diffuse reflectance spectroscopy, part 2: probe design, realization, and experimental validation.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Article
- Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for optical characterizations of orthotopic head and neck cancer modelsBiomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Post-Operational Photodynamic Therapy of the Tumor Bed: Comparative Analysis for Cold Knife and Laser Scalpel Resection.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Non-contact optical spectroscopy for tumor-sensitive diffuse reflectance and fluorescence measurements on murine subcutaneous tissue models: Monte Carlo modeling and experimental validations.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Label-Free Optical Spectroscopy for Early Detection of Oral Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Noninvasive optoacoustic microangiography reveals dose and size dependency of radiation-induced deep tumor vasculature remodeling.Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Article
- Minimally invasiveMethodsX · 2022Article
- Empirical method for rapid quantification of intrinsic fluorescence signals of key metabolic probes from optical spectra measured on tissue-mimicking turbid medium.Journal of biomedical optics · 2021Article
- Red and blue light in antitumor photodynamic therapy with chlorin-based photosensitizers: a comparative animal study assisted by optical imaging modalities.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
- Numerical investigation of depth-sensitive diffuse reflectance and fluorescence measurements on murine subcutaneous tissue with growing solid tumors.Biomedical optics express · 2020Article
- Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy to monitor murine colorectal tumor progression and therapeutic response.Journal of biomedical optics · 2020Article
- Low-cost compact optical spectroscopy and novel spectroscopic algorithm for point-of-care real-time monitoring of nanoparticle delivery in biological tissue models.IEEE journal of selected topics in quantum electronics : a publication of the IEEE Lasers and Electro-optics SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) is a probe-based spectral biopsy technique used in cancer studies to quantify tissue reduced scattering (μs') and absorption (μa) coefficients and vary in source-detector separation (SDS) to fine-tune sampling depth. In subcutaneous murine tumor allografts or xenografts, a key design requirement is ensuring that the source light interrogates past the skin layer into the tumor without significantly sacrificing signal-to-noise ratio (target of ≥15 dB). To resolve this requirement, a DRS probe was designed with four SDSs (0.75, 2.00, 3.00, and 4.00 mm) to interrogate increasing tissue volumes between 450 and 900 nm. The goal was to quantify percent errors in extracting μa and μs', and to quantify sampling depth into subcutaneous Balb/c-CT26 colon tumor allografts. Using an optical phantom-based experimental method, lookup-tables were constructed relating μa,μs', diffuse reflectance, and sampling depth. Percent errors were <10 % and 5% for extracting μa and μs', respectively, for all SDSs. Sampling depth reached up to 1.6 mm at the first Q-band of hemoglobin at 542 nm, the key spectral region for quantifying tissue oxyhemoglobin concentration. This work shows that the DRS probe can accurately extract optical properties and the resultant physiological parameters such as total hemoglobin concentration and tissue oxygen saturation, from sufficient depth within subcutaneous Balb/c-CT26 colon tumor allografts. Methods described here can be generalized for other murine tumor models. Future work will explore the feasibility of the DRS in quantifying volumetric tumor perfusion in response to anticancer therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.