Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30152076›Full record

SynthesisInternational dental journal2019

Are bristle stiffness and bristle end-shape related to adverse effects on soft tissues during toothbrushing? A systematic review.

Nicolle Ranzan, Francisco Wilker Mustafa Gomes Muniz, Cassiano Kuchenbecker Rösing

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International dental journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bioinformation · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Oral Health Attitudes among Preclinical and Clinical Dental Students in Germany.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicolle RanzanDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Francisco Wilker Mustafa Gomes MunizDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3945-1752
Cassiano Kuchenbecker RösingDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundToothbrushing might be associated with the development of soft tissue lesions. This systemic review aimed to examine soft tissue lesions caused by different bristle stiffnesses and bristle end-shapes in manual toothbrushes in adult individuals. MATERIALS AND

methodsScopus, EMBASE and PubMed databases were searched to find controlled trials that evaluated manual toothbrush bristle stiffness and/or end-shape in regard to soft tissue safety. The grey literature was also included in the search strategy. Two reviewers independently performed the screening, final selection and data extraction. To be included, studies had to have been performed using at least two manual toothbrushes differing in bristle stiffness and/or end-shape, and had to report any adverse effects on oral soft tissues after at least 7 days of follow-up. A meta-ethnography strategy was used for qualitative data synthesis. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was assessed to evaluate the risk of bias.

resultsThirteen studies were included from the 1,945 initially retrieved. Toothbrush bristle end-shape was investigated in six studies, bristle stiffness in two, and both features were investigated in five studies. Hard-bristle toothbrushes produced more gingival lesions than medium- and soft-bristle brushes. A slight gingival recession width increase was identified in the end-rounded group, compared with the tapered group. Only four studies presented adverse effects as the primary outcome.

conclusionSoft and extra-soft toothbrushes tend to be safer. Oral soft tissue injuries are similar for both tapered and end-rounded bristles. Further studies investigating adverse effects as a primary outcome are recommended.

Indexed as

Gingival RecessionToothbrushingAdultControlled Clinical Trials as TopicEquipment DesignGingivaHardnessHumansdental devicesgingival recessionhome careOral hygienetoothbrushing

Identifiers

PMID30152076
PMCPMC9379007
OpenAlexW2889249118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.