Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30152073›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2018

Dose escalation of radiotherapy in unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Dalia Elganainy, Emma B Holliday, Cullen M Taniguchi, Grace L Smith, Rachna Shroff, Milind Javle, Kanwal Raghav, Ahmed Kaseb, Thomas A Aloia, Jean Nicolas Vauthey and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Tumor-related local complications as a major contributor to mortality after definitive radiotherapy for unresectable extrahepatic bile duct cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Non-surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dalia ElganainyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0003-4427-986X
Emma B HollidayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Cullen M TaniguchiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Grace L SmithDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Rachna ShroffDepartment of GI Medical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Milind JavleDepartment of GI Medical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Kanwal RaghavDepartment of GI Medical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Ahmed KasebDepartment of GI Medical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-9491-0587
Thomas A AloiaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Jean Nicolas VautheyDepartment of Surgical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Ching-Wei D TzengDepartment of Surgical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Joseph M HermanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Albert C KoongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Sunil X KrishnanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Bruce D MinskyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Christopher H CraneDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Prajnan DasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Eugene J KoayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Clinical Validation Center for Early Detection of Pancreatic CancerU01CA200468 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI ANIRBAN MAITRA · 2016 to 2026
$11.0M
Transport Oncophysics CoreU54CA210181 · NCI · METHODIST HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI WANG, RONGFU · 2016 to 2020
$9.3M
Imaging and Molecular Correlates of Progression in Cystic Neoplasms of the PancreasU01CA196403 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI MAITRA, ANIRBAN · 2015 to 2020
$5.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS U01 CA196403NCI NIH HHS U01 CA200468NCI NIH HHS U54 CA210181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the effect of escalated dose radiation therapy (EDR, defined as doses >50.4 Gy in 28 fractions [59.5 Gy BED]) on overall survival (OS), freedom from local progression (FFLP), and freedom from distant progression (FFDP) of patients with unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC).

methodsA consecutive cohort of 80 patients who underwent radiotherapy for unresectable EHCC from 2001 to 2015 was identified. Demographic, tumor, treatment, toxicity, and laboratory variables were collected. The maximal RT doses ranged from 30 to 75 Gy (median 50.4 Gy, at 1.8-4.5 Gy/fraction). Gross tumor volume (GTV) coverage by maximal dose in EDR group ranged from 38% to 100%. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS, FFLP, and FFDP. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were analyzed.

resultsAfter radiotherapy, median OS, FFLP, and FFDP were 18.7, 22.6, and 24.3 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in OS or FFLP between patients who received EDR to portions of the GTV and patients who did not. On multivariate analysis, bigger GTV, age, and ECOG performance status were independently associated with shorter OS. Local progression on chemotherapy prior to RT was independently associated with shorter FFLP. High baseline neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (>5.3) was independently associated with shorter FFDP. Toxicity grades were similar in EDR and lower doses except lymphopenia which was higher in EDR (P = 0.053).

conclusionsEDR to selective portions of the GTV may not benefit patients with unresectable EHCC despite having acceptable toxicity. New methods to improve local control and survival for unresectable EHCC are needed.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaDose Fractionation, RadiationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisSurvival AnalysisTreatment Outcomedose escalationextrahepatic cholangiocarcinomaradiation therapytoxicityunresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Identifiers

PMID30152073
PMCPMC6198206
OpenAlexW2888992835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.