Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30151942›Full record

SynthesisDigestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society2019

Endoscopic diagnosis of sessile serrated polyp: A systematic review.

Hiroshi Kashida

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A novel endoscopy image fusion system: combine white light imaging and compound band imaging.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Endoscopic diagnosis for colorectal sessile serrated lesions.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hiroshi KashidaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present review was to clarify how we should detect and diagnose sessile serrated polyps (SSP) endoscopically. A systematic search was conducted of MEDLINE from January 2004 through March 2018. Nine findings: (i) proximal location; (ii) size >10 mm; (iii) irregular shape; (iv) indistinctive border; (v) cloud-like surface; (vi) mucus cap; (vii) rim of debris in white-light endoscopy; (viii) dilated vessels; and (ix) dilated crypts (pits) in image-enhanced endoscopy were considered to be candidate discriminators of SSP from hyperplastic polyps. Prospective studies in a general setting are warranted to validate the above-mentioned endoscopic features of SSP during real-time colonoscopy and to determine whether these features are useful for the differential diagnosis of SSP.

Indexed as

EndoscopyColonic PolypsDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansNarrow Band Imagingdifferential diagnosisendoscopysessile serrated adenomasessile serrated polypsessile serrated polyp/adenoma

Identifiers

PMID30151942
PMCPMC7379725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.