Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30151826›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2018

Development of an Adverse Event Surveillance Model for Outpatient Surgery in the Veterans Health Administration.

Hillary J Mull, Kamal M F Itani, Steven D Pizer, Martin P Charns, Peter E Rivard, Nathalie McIntosh, Mary T Hawn, Amy K Rosen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hillary J MullCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-4484-0445
Kamal M F ItaniDepartment of Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
Steven D PizerDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Partnered Evidence-based Policy Resource Center (PEPReC), Boston, MA.
Martin P CharnsCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA.
Peter E RivardCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA.
Nathalie McIntoshMassachusetts Health Quality Partners (MHQP), Boston, MA.
Mary T HawnPalo Alto VA Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA.
Amy K RosenCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-7539-7749
Boston University · USMassachusetts Health Quality Partners · USPalo Alto Veterans Institute for Research · USSuffolk University · US

Funding

HSRD VA IK2 HX001520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDevelop and validate a surveillance model to identify outpatient surgical adverse events (AEs) based on previously developed electronic triggers. DATA SOURCES: Veterans Health Administration's Corporate Data Warehouse. STUDY

designSix surgical AE triggers, including postoperative emergency room visits and hospitalizations, were applied to FY2012-2014 outpatient surgeries (n = 744,355). We randomly sampled trigger-flagged and unflagged cases for nurse chart review to document AEs and measured positive predictive value (PPV) for triggers. Next, we used chart review data to iteratively estimate multilevel logistic regression models to predict the probability of an AE, starting with the six triggers and adding in patient, procedure, and facility characteristics to improve model fit. We validated the final model by applying the coefficients to FY2015 outpatient surgery data (n = 256,690) and reviewing charts for cases at high and moderate probability of an AE. PRINCIPAL

findingsOf 1,730 FY2012-2014 reviewed surgeries, 350 had an AE (20 percent). The final surveillance model c-statistic was 0.81. In FY2015 surgeries with >0.8 predicted probability of an AE (n = 405, 0.15 percent), PPV was 85 percent; in surgeries with a 0.4-0.5 predicted probability of an AE, PPV was 38 percent.

conclusionsThe surveillance model performed well, accurately identifying outpatient surgeries with a high probability of an AE.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyPostoperative ComplicationsAlgorithmsAmbulatory Surgical ProceduresDatabases, FactualHospitalizationHumansPatient ReadmissionQuality Indicators, Health CareQuality of Health CareReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsVeteransambulatory/outpatient careModeling: multilevelquality of care/ patient safety (measurement)surgeryVA health care system

Identifiers

PMID30151826
PMCPMC6232409
OpenAlexW2889168802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.