Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30151812›Full record

ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2019

Fluid-structure interaction simulation of the brain-skull interface for acute subdural haematoma prediction.

Zhou Zhou, Xiaogai Li, Svein Kleiven

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Smoothed particle hydrodynamic modelling of the cerebrospinal fluid for brain biomechanics: Accuracy and stability.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhou ZhouNeuronic Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden. zhouz@kth.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3910-0418
Xiaogai LiNeuronic Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden.
Svein KleivenNeuronic Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden.
KTH Royal Institute of Technology · SE

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions No. 642662.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury is a leading cause of disability and mortality. Finite element-based head models are promising tools for enhanced head injury prediction, mitigation and prevention. The reliability of such models depends heavily on adequate representation of the brain-skull interaction. Nevertheless, the brain-skull interface has been largely simplified in previous three-dimensional head models without accounting for the fluid behaviour of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and its mechanical interaction with the brain and skull. In this study, the brain-skull interface in a previously developed head model is modified as a fluid-structure interaction (FSI) approach, in which the CSF is treated on a moving mesh using an arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian multi-material formulation and the brain on a deformable mesh using a Lagrangian formulation. The modified model is validated against brain-skull relative displacement and intracranial pressure responses and subsequently imposed to an experimentally determined loading known to cause acute subdural haematoma (ASDH). Compared to the original model, the modified model achieves an improved validation performance in terms of brain-skull relative motion and is able to predict the occurrence of ASDH more accurately, indicating the superiority of the FSI approach for brain-skull interface modelling. The introduction of the FSI approach to represent the fluid behaviour of the CSF and its interaction with the brain and skull is crucial for more accurate head injury predictions.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationAccelerationBrainCerebrospinal FluidFinite Element AnalysisHematoma, Subdural, AcuteHumansIntracranial PressureReproducibility of ResultsSkullStress, MechanicalArbitrary Lagrangian–EulerianBrain–skull interfaceFinite element analysisFluid–structure interactionTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID30151812
PMCPMC6373285
OpenAlexW2889178100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.