Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30151767›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2018

Quantitative Proteomics of Xenopus Embryos I, Sample Preparation.

Meera Gupta, Matthew Sonnett, Lillia Ryazanova, Marc Presler, Martin Wühr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Synergistic Arg-C Ultra and Lys-C Digestion for Quantitative Proteomics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Identification of Deubiquitinase Substrates in Xenopus Egg Extract.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Meera GuptaDepartment of Molecular Biology and Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Matthew SonnettDepartment of Molecular Biology and Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Lillia RyazanovaDepartment of Molecular Biology and Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Marc PreslerDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Martin WührDepartment of Molecular Biology and Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA. wuhr@princeton.edu.

Funding

Development of New Proteomics Technology and its Application to Study Cellular OrganizationR35GM128813 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI Martin Wühr · 2018 to 2026
$4.0M
Cell Cycle proteomicsin XenopusR01GM103785 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI KIRSCHNER, MARC WALLACE · 2012 to 2016
$2.2M
Using Quantitative Proteomics to Understand Mitotic Spindle Composition and FunctionF31GM116451 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI SONNETT, MATTHEW MCLEAN · 2015 to 2017
$131k
NIGMS NIH HHS F31 GM116451NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM103785NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128813
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xenopus oocytes and embryos are model systems optimally suited for quantitative proteomics. This is due to the availability of large amount of protein material and the ease of physical manipulation. Furthermore, facile in vitro fertilization provides superbly synchronized embryos for cell cycle and developmental stages. Here, we detail protocols developed over the last few years for sample preparation of multiplexed proteomics with TMT-tags followed by quantitative mass spectrometry analysis using the MultiNotch MS3 approach. In this approach, each condition is barcoded with an isobaric tag at the peptide level. After barcoding, samples are combined and the relative abundance of ~100,000 peptides is quantified on a mass spectrometer. High reproducibility of the sample preparation process prior to peptides being tagged and combined is of upmost importance for obtaining unbiased data. Otherwise, differences in sample handling can inadvertently appear as biological changes. We detail and exemplify the application of our sample workflow on an embryonic time-series of ten developmental stages of Xenopus laevis embryos ranging from the egg to stage 35 (just before hatching). Our accompanying paper (Chapter 14 ) details a bioinformatics pipeline to analyze the quality of the given sample preparation and strategies to convert spectra of X. laevis peptides into biologically interpretable data.

Indexed as

AnimalsChemical PrecipitationChromatography, LiquidCysteineEgg YolkEmbryo, NonmammalianHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMass SpectrometryPeptidesProteomicsQuality ControlSolid Phase ExtractionXenopusXenopus ProteinsCysteinePeptidesXenopus ProteinsDevelopmentMass spectrometryMultiplexingProtein dynamicsProteomicsSample preparationTMTXenopus laevisYolk

Identifiers

PMID30151767
PMCPMC6564683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.