ArticlePharmacoEconomics2019
Estimating Informal Caregiving Time from Patient EQ-5D Data: The Informal CARE Effect (iCARE) Tool.
Article in PharmacoEconomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cost-Utility Analyses of Interventions for Informal Carers: A Systematic and Critical Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2020Pooled it
- Spillover Effects of Medical Innovations: A Universal and Scalable Approach to Measure the Societal Value of Avoided Informal Care Time.Applied health economics and health policy · 2026Article
- From Paper to Platform: Updating the Dutch Costing Manual and Launching a Web Application.PharmacoEconomics · 2026Article
- Measuring and valuing spillover effects in caregivers and families: A scoping review.PloS one · 2026Article
- Carer Health-Related Quality of Life: A Review of Modelling Considerations in National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisals (2000-2023).PharmacoEconomics - open · 2025Article
- On spillovers in economic evaluations: definition, mapping review and research agenda.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024Review
- Research trends in contemporary health economics: a scientometric analysis on collective content of specialty journals.Health economics review · 2024Review
- Implementation of a value-based approach for older people who have suffered an acute myocardial infarction: study protocol.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Informal Care Costs According to Age and Proximity to Death to Support Cost-Effectiveness Analyses.PharmacoEconomics · 2023Article
- Burden and Gender inequalities around Informal Care.Investigacion y educacion en enfermeria · 2020Review
- The burden of informal caregiving in Hungary, Poland and Slovenia: results from national representative surveys.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2019Article
- Advances in Methods and Novel Applications for Measuring Family Spillover Effects of Illness.PharmacoEconomics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFamilies and friends provide a considerable proportion of care for patients and elderly people. Caregiving can have substantial effects on caregivers' lives, health, and well-being. However, because clinical trials rarely assess these effects, no information on caregiver burden is available when evaluating the cost effectiveness of treatments.
objectiveThis study develops an algorithm for estimating caregiver time using information that is typically available in clinical trials: the EQ-5D scores of patients and their gender.
methodsFour datasets with a total of 8012 observations of dyads of caregivers and a gamma model with a log-link estimated with the Bayesian approach were used to estimate the statistical association between patient scores on the EQ-5D-3L dimensions and the numbers of hours of care provided by caregivers during the previous week. The model predicts hours of care as mean point estimates with 95% credible intervals or entire distributions.
resultsModel predictions of hours of care based on the five EQ-5D dimensions ranged from 13.06 (12.7-14.5) h/week for female patients reporting no health problems but receiving informal care to 52.82 (39.38-66.26) for male patients with the highest level of problems on all EQ-5D dimensions.
conclusionsThe iCARE algorithm developed in this study allows researchers who only have patient-level EQ-5D data to estimate the mean hours of informal care received per week, including a 95% Bayesian credible interval. Caregiver time can be multiplied with a monetary value for caregiving, enabling the inclusion of informal care costs in economic evaluations. We recommend using the tool for samples that fall within the confidence intervals of the characteristics of our samples: men (age range 47.0-104.2 years), women (age range 55-103 years).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.