Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30151485›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Belgian Society of Radiology2016

MR-Imaging of Meniscal Substitution.

Tineke De Coninck, Peter Verdonk, Koenraad Verstraete

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Belgian Radiology Research in Full Power!Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tineke De ConinckDepartment of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Peter VerdonkAntwerp Orthopedic Center, Monica Hospitals, Harmoniestraat 68, 2018 Antwerp, Belgium.
Koenraad VerstraeteDepartment of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than a century ago, the menisci were considered to be the functionless remains of a leg muscle. Gradually the usefulness and function of the meniscus was investigated and proven, and the link between total meniscectomy, radiographic osteoarthritis and reduced knee function was made. Subsequently, partial meniscectomy was introduced in the clinical practice. However, the frequency of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis was not substantially lowered. Therefore, meniscal repair was introduced for younger individuals with traumatic meniscus lesions with a good healing potential. Later on in the development process, the quest for meniscal replacement strategies arose. The introduction of allogenic, xenogenic and artificial materials followed in research and clinical settings. Nowadays, a lot of research is conducted on meniscal substitutes, because meniscal injuries are a very common problem in the general population. The imaging of the meniscus is running parallel to this evolution. With the development of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the meniscus could be perfectly visualized. A lot of studies were published on imaging of the normal meniscus, and subsequently meniscal pathology on MRI was investigated. In the current literature, a growing number of papers describe the MRI findings in artificial meniscus replacements.

Indexed as

AllograftsImplantsKneeMeniscusMRI

Identifiers

PMID30151485
PMCPMC6100534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.