Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30151396›Full record

ArticleBurns & trauma2018

Multi-institutional analysis of independent predictors for burn mortality in the United States.

Dmitry Zavlin, Vishwanath Chegireddy, Stefanos Boukovalas, Anna M Nia, Ludwik K Branski, Jeffrey D Friedman, Anthony Echo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Burns & trauma, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. How Long Do We Have? A Retrospective Review of Palliative Extubation in the Burn Unit.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Factors Contributing to Long-Term Medicaid Sustainment Among Burn Patients Enrolled via California's Hospital Presumptive Eligibility Program.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Clinical Outcomes Among Elderly People With Burns.Annals of burns and fire disasters · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Age and Injury Size Influence the Magnitude of Fecal Dysbiosis in Adult Burn Patients.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Patient Reported Experiences at a Swedish National Burn Centre.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dmitry Zavlin1Institute for Reconstructive Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, 6560 Fannin Street, Scurlock Tower, Suite 2200, Houston, TX 77030 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3753-5511
Vishwanath Chegireddy1Institute for Reconstructive Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, 6560 Fannin Street, Scurlock Tower, Suite 2200, Houston, TX 77030 USA.
Stefanos Boukovalas2Division of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX USA.
Anna M Nia3School of Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX USA.
Ludwik K Branski2Division of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX USA.
Jeffrey D Friedman1Institute for Reconstructive Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, 6560 Fannin Street, Scurlock Tower, Suite 2200, Houston, TX 77030 USA.
Anthony Echo1Institute for Reconstructive Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, 6560 Fannin Street, Scurlock Tower, Suite 2200, Houston, TX 77030 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious reports individually identified different factors that predict death after burns. The authors employed the multi-center American Burn Association's (ABA) National Burn Repository (NBR) to elucidate which parameters have the highest negative impact on burn mortality.

methodsWe audited data from the NBR v8.0 for the years 2002-2011 and included 137,061 patients in our study. The cases were stratified into two cohorts based on the primary outcome of death/survival and then evaluated for demographic data, intraoperative details, and their morbidity after admission. A multivariable regression analysis aimed to identify independent risk factors associated with mortality.

resultsA total of 3.3% of patients in this analysis did not survive their burn injuries. Of those, 52.0% expired within 7 days after admission. Patients in the mortality cohort were of older age (

conclusionUninsured status, inhalation injury, in-hospital complications, and operative procedures were the strongest mortality predictors after burns. Since most fatal outcomes (52.0%) occur within 7 days after injury, physicians and medical staff need to be aware of these risk factors upon patient admission to a burn center.

Indexed as

BurnsDeathMortalityOutcomesRisks

Identifiers

PMID30151396
PMCPMC6103989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.