Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30151375›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2018

Plasma Chemokine CCL2 and Its Receptor CCR2 Concentrations as Diagnostic Biomarkers for Breast Cancer Patients.

Emilia Lubowicka, Andrzej Przylipiak, Monika Zajkowska, Barbara Maria Piskór, Paweł Malinowski, Wojciech Fiedorowicz, Sławomir Ławicki

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Spiegelmer Aptamers: Innovative Approach in Breast Cancer.Breast cancer : basic and clinical research · 2026
    Review
  5. Circulating CD3Cancer medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emilia LubowickaDepartment of Esthetic Medicine, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-267 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5002-4076
Andrzej PrzylipiakDepartment of Esthetic Medicine, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-267 Bialystok, Poland.
Monika ZajkowskaDepartment of Biochemical Diagnostics, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-269 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5179-0722
Barbara Maria PiskórDepartment of Esthetic Medicine, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-267 Bialystok, Poland.
Paweł MalinowskiDepartment of Oncological Surgery, Bialystok Oncology Center, Bialystok, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland.
Wojciech FiedorowiczDepartment of Oncological Surgery, Bialystok Oncology Center, Bialystok, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland.
Sławomir ŁawickiDepartment of Biochemical Diagnostics, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-269 Bialystok, Poland.
Medical University of Białystok · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate plasma levels and applicability of CCL2, CCR2, and tumor marker CA 15-3 in breast cancer (BC) patients and in relation to the control groups: patients with benign breast tumor and healthy subjects. Plasma levels of tested parameters were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and CA 15-3 by Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay (CMIA). The median levels of CCL2 in entire group of BC were significantly higher compared to the control groups, similarly as median levels of CA 15-3. CCR2 is a negative marker whose levels were significantly lower in BC group compared to healthy women. The concentration of CCL2 in BC increases with advancing tumor stage, while a median level of CCR2 decreases with advancing stage. CCL2 showed the highest value of sensitivity (SE) (64.95%) in entire BC group and also in early stages of disease. The highest specificity (SP) was obtained by CA 15-3 (85.71%). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of CCR2 (0.7304) was the largest of all the tested parameters (slightly lower than CA 15-3) in the entire BC group, but a maximum range was obtained for the combination of all tested parameters with CA 15-3 (0.8271). In early stages of BC the highest AUC of all tested parameters was observed in CCL2 or CCR2 (stage I: 0.6604 and 0.6564; respectively; stage II: 0.7768, respectively, for CCR2). The findings of this study suggest that there may be applicability of CCL2, CCR2 in diagnosis of BC patients, particularly in conjunction with CA 15-3.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesChemokine CCL2FemaleHumansMiddle AgedPolandReceptors, CCR2ROC CurveYoung AdultBiomarkers, TumorCCL2 protein, humanCCR2 protein, humanChemokine CCL2Receptors, CCR2

Identifiers

PMID30151375
PMCPMC6091289
OpenAlexW2884906365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.