Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30151131›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2015

An examination of fitness costs of glyphosate resistance in the common morning glory,

Catherine L Debban, Sara Okum, Kathleen E Pieper, Ariana Wilson, Regina S Baucom

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine L DebbanDepartment of Biology University of Virginia 229 Gilmer Hall Charlottesville Virginia 22904.
Sara OkumBiological Sciences Department University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH 45221.
Kathleen E PieperDavison Life Sciences Building University of Georgia 120 East Green Street Athens Georgia 30602-7223.
Ariana WilsonDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Michigan 2059 Kraus Natural Science Building Ann Arbor Michigan 48103.
Regina S BaucomDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Michigan 2059 Kraus Natural Science Building Ann Arbor Michigan 48103.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Cincinnati · USUniversity of Georgia · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fitness costs are frequently invoked to explain the presence of genetic variation underlying plant defense across many types of damaging agents. Despite the expectation that costs of resistance are prevalent, however, they have been difficult to detect in nature. To examine the potential that resistance confers a fitness cost, we examined the survival and fitness of genetic lines of the common morning glory,

Indexed as

Defensefitness coststrade‐offsweed

Identifiers

PMID30151131
PMCPMC6102511
OpenAlexW1860621429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.