ArticleFrontiers in psychology2018
What Is Going Through Your Mind? Thinking Aloud as a Method in Cross-Cultural Psychology.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Researched Apps Used in Dementia Care for People Living With Dementia and Their Informal Caregivers: Systematic Review on App Features, Security, and Usability.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Pooled it
- Trial
- The Nursing Implementation Complexity Tool for Digital Technology Implementation in Nursing: Design Science Research Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Pharmacists' views on potential non-medical prescribing for pharmacists in Sweden: a nationwide survey study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Italian Version of the Fundamentals of Care Framework and the Fundamentals of Care Practice Process: A Comprehensive Validation Study.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Self-Reflection Protects Behavior from Volatile Beliefs Linked to Paranoia.Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Decision support strategies for bedside nursing clinical reasoning: A scoping review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025Review
- An Information App (e-TOP) to Support Parents' Information Needs During the First Year at Home After Preterm Birth: Development and Usability Study.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2025Article
- Development of a World Health Organization indicator and corresponding questions to measure effective coverage of rehabilitation.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Safety Culture Through Patient Voice: Qualitative Validation of the Patients' Perceptions of Safety Culture Scale (PaPSC) in Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Surgery.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Usability and Acceptability of a Pregnancy App for Substance Use Screening and Education: A Mixed Methods Exploratory Pilot Study.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2025Article
- Think-Aloud Testing of a Companion App for Colonoscopy Examinations: Usability Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Improving the usability of online resources to support implementation research and practice: The RE-AIM website use case.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Article
- Exploring the usability of the virtual reality module LEAF CAFÉ: a qualitative think-aloud study.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- A Cross-Sectional Study Identifying Medication Adherence Technologies (MATech) in Sweden Using Behavior Change Techniques.Patient preference and adherence · 2024Article
- Relevance theory for mapping cognitive biases in fact-checking: an argumentative approach.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- MoveONParkinson: developing a personalized motivational solution for Parkinson's disease management.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Parent Perspectives for Type B Ulnar Polydactyly Management.Hand (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Review
- The knowledge map of gender equality in cross-cultural communication: A bibliometric approach.Heliyon · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thinking aloud is the concurrent verbalization of thoughts while performing a task. The study of thinking-aloud protocols has a long tradition in cognitive psychology, the field of education, and the industrial-organizational context. It has been used rarely in cultural and cross-cultural psychology. This paper will describe thinking aloud as a useful method in cultural and cross-cultural psychology referring to a few studies in general and one study in particular to show the wide applications of this method. Thinking-aloud protocols can be applied for (a) improving the validity of cross-cultural surveys, (b) process analysis of thoughts and the analysis of changes over time, (c) theory development across cultures, (d) the study of cultural meaning systems, and (e) individual as well as group level analyses allowing hypothesis testing cross-culturally. Limitations of the thinking-aloud method are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.