Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30150847›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of robotics research2018

Enhanced Real-Time Pose Estimation for Closed-Loop Robotic Manipulation of Magnetically Actuated Capsule Endoscopes.

Addisu Z Taddese, Piotr R Slawinski, Marco Pirotta, Elena De Momi, Keith L Obstein, Pietro Valdastri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of robotics research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Few-Shot Magnet Localization Using Sim-to-Real Transfer Learning.IEEE robotics and automation letters · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Robotic Autonomy for Magnetic Endoscope Biopsy.IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Magnetic Soft Materials and Robots.Chemical reviews · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Addisu Z TaddeseScience and Technology of Robotics in Medicine (STORM) Laboratory USA, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Piotr R SlawinskiScience and Technology of Robotics in Medicine (STORM) Laboratory USA, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Marco PirottaDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Elena De MomiDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Keith L ObsteinScience and Technology of Robotics in Medicine (STORM) Laboratory USA, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Pietro ValdastriScience and Technology of Robotics in Medicine (STORM) Laboratory UK, School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Funding

Translational Analysis CoreP30DK058404 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI RICHARD M. PEEK · 2002 to 2026
$29.9M
A magnetic capsule endoscope for colonoscopy in patients with inflammatory bowel diseaseR01EB018992 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI OBSTEIN, KEITH L · 2014 to 2024
$2.8M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB018992NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK058404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pose estimation methods for robotically guided magnetic actuation of capsule endoscopes have recently enabled trajectory following and automation of repetitive endoscopic maneuvers. However, these methods face significant challenges in their path to clinical adoption including the presence of regions of magnetic field singularity, where the accuracy of the system degrades, and the need for accurate initialization of the capsule's pose. In particular, the singularity problem exists for any pose estimation method that utilizes a single source of magnetic field if the method does not rely on the motion of the magnet to obtain multiple measurements from different vantage points. We analyze the workspace of such pose estimation methods with the use of the point-dipole magnetic field model and show that singular regions exist in areas where the capsule is nominally located during magnetic actuation. Since the dipole model can approximate most magnetic field sources, the problem discussed herein pertains to a wider set of pose estimation techniques. We then propose a novel hybrid approach employing static and time-varying magnetic field sources and show that this system has no regions of singularity. The proposed system was experimentally validated for accuracy, workspace size, update rate and performance in regions of magnetic singularity. The system performed as well or better than prior pose estimation methods without requiring accurate initialization and was robust to magnetic singularity. Experimental demonstration of closed-loop control of a tethered magnetic device utilizing the developed pose estimation technique is provided to ascertain its suitability for robotically guided capsule endoscopy. Hence, advances in closed-loop control and intelligent automation of magnetically actuated capsule endoscopes can be further pursued toward clinical realization by employing this pose estimation system.

Indexed as

capsule endoscopylocalizationmagnetic actuationPose estimationrobotic endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID30150847
PMCPMC6108552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.