ArticleThe International journal of robotics research2018
Enhanced Real-Time Pose Estimation for Closed-Loop Robotic Manipulation of Magnetically Actuated Capsule Endoscopes.
Article in The International journal of robotics research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cooperative integrated surgical robots for high-performance targeted therapies.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2026Review
- Magnetically actuated momentum-driven millirobots.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Few-Shot Magnet Localization Using Sim-to-Real Transfer Learning.IEEE robotics and automation letters · 2025Article
- Magnetic localization and manipulation of locking synchronous motors.Communications engineering · 2025Article
- External Steering of Vine Robots via Magnetic Actuation.Soft robotics · 2025Article
- Advances of surgical robotics: image-guided classification and application.National science review · 2024Review
- Exact and Computationally Robust Solutions for Cylindrical Magnets Systems with Programmable Magnetization.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Robotic, self-propelled, self-steerable, and disposable colonoscopes: Reality or pipe dream? A state of the art review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Review
- Robotic Autonomy for Magnetic Endoscope Biopsy.IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics · 2022Article
- Telerobotic neurovascular interventions with magnetic manipulation.Science robotics · 2022Article
- Magnetic Soft Materials and Robots.Chemical reviews · 2022Review
- Active Stabilization of Interventional Tasks Utilizing a Magnetically Manipulated Endoscope.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2022Article
- Autonomous navigation of a magnetic colonoscope using force sensing and a heuristic search algorithm.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- A localization method for wireless capsule endoscopy using side wall cameras and IMU sensor.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Endoluminal Motion Recognition of a Magnetically-Guided Capsule Endoscope Based on Capsule-Tissue Interaction Force.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Posture Dynamic Modeling and Stability Analysis of a Magnetic Driven Dual-Spin Spherical Capsule Robot.Micromachines · 2021Article
- Magnetic flexible endoscope for colonoscopy: an initial learning curve analysis.Endoscopy international open · 2021Article
- Endorobots for Colonoscopy: Design Challenges and Available Technologies.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2021Review
- Robotic Localization Based on Planar Cable Robot and Hall Sensor Array Applied to Magnetic Capsule Endoscope.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Enabling the future of colonoscopy with intelligent and autonomous magnetic manipulation.Nature machine intelligence · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pose estimation methods for robotically guided magnetic actuation of capsule endoscopes have recently enabled trajectory following and automation of repetitive endoscopic maneuvers. However, these methods face significant challenges in their path to clinical adoption including the presence of regions of magnetic field singularity, where the accuracy of the system degrades, and the need for accurate initialization of the capsule's pose. In particular, the singularity problem exists for any pose estimation method that utilizes a single source of magnetic field if the method does not rely on the motion of the magnet to obtain multiple measurements from different vantage points. We analyze the workspace of such pose estimation methods with the use of the point-dipole magnetic field model and show that singular regions exist in areas where the capsule is nominally located during magnetic actuation. Since the dipole model can approximate most magnetic field sources, the problem discussed herein pertains to a wider set of pose estimation techniques. We then propose a novel hybrid approach employing static and time-varying magnetic field sources and show that this system has no regions of singularity. The proposed system was experimentally validated for accuracy, workspace size, update rate and performance in regions of magnetic singularity. The system performed as well or better than prior pose estimation methods without requiring accurate initialization and was robust to magnetic singularity. Experimental demonstration of closed-loop control of a tethered magnetic device utilizing the developed pose estimation technique is provided to ascertain its suitability for robotically guided capsule endoscopy. Hence, advances in closed-loop control and intelligent automation of magnetically actuated capsule endoscopes can be further pursued toward clinical realization by employing this pose estimation system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.