ArticleJournal of food science and technology2018
Extraction of ferulic acid and vanilla acid by hydrophobic ionic liquid 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate.
Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study was carried out to evaluate the extraction efficiency of ferulic acid (FA) and vanilla acid (VA) from aqueous phase into IL phase. To achieve the highest extraction efficiency, the influence of varying key parameters was evaluated and optimized by response surface methodology based on Box-Behnken design, including phase volume ratio, extraction temperature and extraction time. FA (or VA) extraction under the optimal conditions were: phase volume ratio of 1.38 (1.28), extraction temperature of 66.34 °C (49.28 °C) and extraction time of 33.83 min (36.64 min) under optimum conditions an average extraction efficiency of 97.11 ± 1.05% for FA was achieved, while VA was 85.43 ± 1.62%. This was very close to the predicted value from the model, 98.05% (86.16%). Additionally, recycling and utilization of ILs were performed well with the recovery ratio for 81.0%. Based on thermodynamic analysis, FTIR and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.