Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30150744›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2018

Partial genomic survival of cave bears in living brown bears.

Axel Barlow, James A Cahill, Stefanie Hartmann, Christoph Theunert, Georgios Xenikoudakis, Gloria G Fortes, Johanna L A Paijmans, Gernot Rabeder, Christine Frischauf, Aurora Grandal-d'Anglade and 13 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
17.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 175 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genome analyses suggest recent speciation and postglacial isolation in the Norwegian lemming.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 14 institutions in 12 countries.

Axel BarlowInstitute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany. axel.barlow.ab@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5532-9458
James A CahillDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7145-0215
Stefanie HartmannInstitute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Christoph TheunertDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Georgios XenikoudakisInstitute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Gloria G FortesInstitute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Johanna L A PaijmansInstitute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Gernot RabederInstitute of Palaeontology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christine FrischaufInstitute of Palaeontology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Aurora Grandal-d'AngladeInstituto Universitario de Xeoloxía, Universidade da Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Ana García-VázquezInstituto Universitario de Xeoloxía, Universidade da Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Marine MurtskhvaladzeIlia State University, Institute of Ecology, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Urmas SaarmaDepartment of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Peeter AnijalgDepartment of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Tomaž SkrbinšekDepartment of Biology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Giorgio BertorelleDepartment of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Boris GasparianInstitute of Archaeology and Ethnography, National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Armenia, Yerevan, Armenia.
Guy Bar-OzZinman Institute of Archaeology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Ron PinhasiEarth Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Montgomery SlatkinDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Love DalénDepartment of Bioinformatics and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden.
Beth ShapiroDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
Michael HofreiterInstitute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
University of Potsdam · DEUniversidade da Coruña · ESUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · USUniversity of Tartu · EEUniversity of Vienna · ATIlia State University · GEInstitute of Archaeology and Ethnography · AMMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology · DESwedish Museum of Natural History · SEUniversity College Dublin · IEUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Ferrara · ITUniversity of Haifa · ILUniversity of Ljubljana · SI

Funding

MODELS OF COMPLEX GENETIC SYSTEMSR01GM040282 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI SLATKIN, MONTGOMERY WILSON · 1988 to 2017
$4.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM040282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although many large mammal species went extinct at the end of the Pleistocene epoch, their DNA may persist due to past episodes of interspecies admixture. However, direct empirical evidence of the persistence of ancient alleles remains scarce. Here, we present multifold coverage genomic data from four Late Pleistocene cave bears (Ursus spelaeus complex) and show that cave bears hybridized with brown bears (Ursus arctos) during the Pleistocene. We develop an approach to assess both the directionality and relative timing of gene flow. We find that segments of cave bear DNA still persist in the genomes of living brown bears, with cave bears contributing 0.9 to 2.4% of the genomes of all brown bears investigated. Our results show that even though extinction is typically considered as absolute, following admixture, fragments of the gene pool of extinct species can survive for tens of thousands of years in the genomes of extant recipient species.

Indexed as

Extinction, BiologicalGene FlowHybridization, GeneticAnimalsGenomicsUrsidae

Identifiers

PMID30150744
PMCPMC6590514
OpenAlexW2888228615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.