Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30150694›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Modeling of inhomogeneous electromagnetic fields in the nervous system: a novel paradigm in understanding cell interactions, disease etiology and therapy.

Jasmina Isakovic, Ian Dobbs-Dixon, Dipesh Chaudhury, Dinko Mitrecic

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jasmina IsakovicOmnion Research International, Zagreb, Croatia. ji520@nyu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5971-3142
Ian Dobbs-DixonDivision of Science, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Dipesh ChaudhuryDivision of Science, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Dinko MitrecicLaboratory for Stem Cells, Department for Neurogenetics, Medical Genetics and Regenerative Neuroscience, Croatian Institute for Brain Research, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-4836-1721
New York University Abu Dhabi · AEInstitute for Development and International Relations · HRUniversity of Zagreb · HR

Funding

EC | Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion | European Social Fund (Fondo Social Europeo) EU ESF 3.2.01-0180Hrvatska Zaklada za Znanost (Croatian Science Foundation) IP-2016-06-9451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All major processes in the nervous system depend on interactions between cells and nerve fibers. In this work we present a novel model of inhomogeneous electromagnetic fields originating from nerve fibers and delineate their influence on cells. By expanding Hodgkin-Huxley's applied current into axial current, governed by[Formula: see text], we reveal that cell-with-neuron interactions are regulated by the strength of the electromagnetic fields, which are homogeneous up to 2.066 μm or 6.606 μm away from neurilemma and axolemma, respectively. At the nodes of Ranvier, these fields reach strengths of 3.0 × 10

Indexed as

Electromagnetic FieldsCell CommunicationDemyelinating DiseasesHumansNervous SystemNeurons

Identifiers

PMID30150694
PMCPMC6110729
OpenAlexW2888585800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.