Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30150219›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

Sex differences in local adaptation: what can we learn from reciprocal transplant experiments?

Erik I Svensson, Debora Goedert, Miguel A Gómez-Llano, Foteini Spagopoulou, Angela Nava-Bolaños, Isobel Booksmythe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Climatic factors and species range position predict sexually antagonistic selection across taxa.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sex-specific ornament evolution is a consistent feature of climatic adaptation across space and time in dragonflies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Selection on phenotypic plasticity favors thermal canalization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Linking local adaptation with the evolution of sex differences.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  16. On the role of sex differences for evolution in heterogeneous and changing fitness landscapes: insights from pygmy grasshoppers.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Erik I SvenssonDepartment of Biology, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden erik.svensson@biol.lu.se.ORCID 0000-0001-9006-016X
Debora GoedertDepartment of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2406-9438
Miguel A Gómez-LlanoDepartment of Biology, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.
Foteini SpagopoulouAnimal Ecology, Department of Ecology and Evolution, Uppsala University, 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden.
Angela Nava-BolañosDepartamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apdo. Postal 70-275, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510 Ciudad de México, México.
Isobel BooksmytheSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, 3800 Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9108-1018

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Local adaptation is of fundamental interest to evolutionary biologists. Traditionally, local adaptation has been studied using reciprocal transplant experiments to quantify fitness differences between residents and immigrants in pairwise transplants between study populations. Previous studies have detected local adaptation in some cases, but others have shown lack of adaptation or even maladaptation. Recently, the importance of different fitness components, such as survival and fecundity, to local adaptation have been emphasized. Here, we address another neglected aspect in studies of local adaptation: sex differences. Given the ubiquity of sexual dimorphism in life histories and phenotypic traits, this neglect is surprising, but may be partly explained by differences in research traditions and terminology in the fields of local adaptation and sexual selection. Studies that investigate differences in mating success between resident and immigrants across populations tend to be framed in terms of reproductive and behavioural isolation, rather than local adaptation. We briefly review the published literature that bridges these areas and suggest that reciprocal transplant experiments could benefit from quantifying both male and female fitness components. Such a more integrative research approach could clarify the role of sex differences in the evolution of local adaptations.This article is part of the theme issue 'Linking local adaptation with the evolution of sex differences'.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAcclimatizationAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBiological EvolutionFemaleGene FlowGenetic FitnessMalePhenotypeReproductionSelection, Geneticfemale demographic dominancegene flowintersexual genetic correlationlocal adaptationreciprocal transplant experimentssexual dimorphism

Identifiers

PMID30150219
PMCPMC6125722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.