Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30149812›Full record

SynthesisNutrition journal2018

Role of milk and dairy intake in cognitive function in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jounghee Lee, Zhuxuan Fu, Mei Chung, Dai-Ja Jang, Hae-Jeung Lee

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrition journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Dairy products and brain structure in French older adults.The British journal of nutrition · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Stages of Change in Dairy Intake among Older Adults: Application of the Transtheoretical Model.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jounghee LeeDepartment of Nutrition Education, Kyonggi University, Suwon-si, South Korea.
Zhuxuan FuDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Mei ChungDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, USA.
Dai-Ja JangResearch Group of Nutrition and Diet, Korea Food Research Institute, Wanju-gun, South Korea.
Hae-Jeung LeeDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Gachon University, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 461-701, South Korea. skysea@gachon.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0001-8353-3619

Funding

STRUCTURE AND STABILITY OF THE GCN4 LEUCINE ZIPPERK11CA001607 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI BROWN, RUSSELL A · 1991 to 1994
–
Korea Food Research Institute E0150302-03National Research Council of Science and Technology CAP-16-07-KIOM, GN160800-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs aging populations increase across the globe, research on lifestyle factors that prevent cognitive decline and dementia is urgently needed. Therefore, a systematic review was conducted to examine the effects of varying levels of milk intake alone or in combination with other dairy products on the outcomes of cognitive function and disorders in adults.

methodsA comprehensive search was conducted across 3 databases (PUBMED, CINAHL, and EMBASE) from their inception through October 2017. Prospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that enrolled adults were included. Studies with follow-up durations of less than 4 weeks and studies including schizophrenic patients were excluded. Two independent investigators conducted abstract and full-text screenings, data extractions, and risk-of-bias (ROB) assessments using validated tools. Studies were synthesized qualitatively using a strength of evidence (SoE) rating tool. A random-effects model for meta-analysis was conducted when at least 3 unique studies reported sufficient quantitative data for the same outcome.

resultsA total of 1 RCT and 7 cohort studies were included. One medium-quality small RCT (n = 38 participants) showed that only spatial working memory was marginally better in the high dairy diet group compared to the low dairy diet group. Two of the 7 cohort studies were rated as having a high ROB, and only 1 cohort study was rated as having a low ROB. There were large methodological and clinical heterogeneities, such as the methods used to assess milk or dairy intake and the characteristics of the study populations. It was impossible to conduct a dose-response meta-analysis because the studies utilized different categories of exposures (e.g., different frequencies of milk consumption or the amount of dairy intake). Thus, the overall SoE was rated as insufficient regarding the associations between milk intake and cognitive decline, dementia, and Alzheimer's disease outcomes. Our meta-analysis of 3 cohort studies showed no significant association between milk intake and cognitive decline outcome (pooled adjusted risk ratio = 1.21; 95% CI: 0.81, 1.82; for highest vs. lowest intake) with large statistical heterogeneity (I

conclusionsThe existing evidence (mostly observational) is too poor to draw a firm conclusion regarding the effect of milk or dairy intake on the risk of cognitive decline or disorders in adults.

Indexed as

CognitionDairy ProductsDietMilkAgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseAnimalsCognitive DysfunctionCohort StudiesDementiaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedAlzheimer’s diseaseCognitive declineMeta-analysisMilkSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30149812
PMCPMC6112122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.