Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30149519›Full record

ArticleNutrients2018

Impact of Meeting Different Guidelines for Protein Intake on Muscle Mass and Physical Function in Physically Active Older Women.

Andreas Nilsson, Diego Montiel Rojas, Fawzi Kadi

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Protein Digestibility of Cereal Products.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andreas NilssonSchool of Health Sciences, Örebro University, 702 81 Örebro, Sweden. andreas.nilsson@oru.se.ORCID 0000-0003-3793-335X
Diego Montiel RojasSchool of Health Sciences, Örebro University, 702 81 Örebro, Sweden. diego.montiel@oru.se.
Fawzi KadiSchool of Health Sciences, Örebro University, 702 81 Örebro, Sweden. fawzi.kadi@oru.se.
Örebro University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of dietary protein intake on muscle mass and physical function in older adults is important for the prevention of age-related physical limitations. The aim of the present study was to elucidate links between dietary protein intake and muscle mass and physical function in older women meeting current guidelines of objectively assessed physical activity. In 106 women (65 to 70 years old), protein intake was assessed using a 6-day food record and participants were classified into high and low protein intake groups using two Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) thresholds (0.8 g·kg

Indexed as

Diet, High-ProteinDiet, Protein-RestrictedExerciseGuideline AdherenceHealthy AgingNutritional StatusRecommended Dietary AllowancesAgedAge FactorsBody CompositionCross-Sectional StudiesDietary ProteinsFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansMuscle ContractionDietary Proteinselderlymuscle strengthnutritionphysical activityphysical functioningRecommended Dietary Allowance (RDA)sarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID30149519
PMCPMC6163522
OpenAlexW2888312272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.