Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30149332›Full record

Trial reportJournal of affective disorders2018

D-Cycloserine augmentation of cognitive behavior therapy for pediatric OCD: Predictors and moderators of outcome.

Sabine Wilhelm, Noah Berman, Brent J Small, Rachel Porth, Eric A Storch, Daniel Geller

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of affective disorders, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sabine WilhelmDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 185 Cambridge Street, Suite 2000, Boston, MA 02114, United States. Electronic address: swilhelm@mgh.harvard.edu.
Noah BermanDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 185 Cambridge Street, Suite 2000, Boston, MA 02114, United States.
Brent J SmallSchool of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
Rachel PorthDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 185 Cambridge Street, Suite 2000, Boston, MA 02114, United States.
Eric A StorchSchool of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States; Menninger Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, United States.
Daniel GellerDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 185 Cambridge Street, Suite 2000, Boston, MA 02114, United States.
Harvard University · USBaylor College of Medicine · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

2/2-D-Cycloserine Augmentation of CBT for Pediatric OCDR01MH093402 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI GELLER, DANIEL A · 2011 to 2014
$1.7M
1/2-D-Cycloserine Augmentation of CBT for Pediatric OCDR01MH093381 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI STORCH, ERIC A. · 2011 to 2014
$1.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH093381NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH093402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver half of children receiving cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) do not fully remit. To improve response rates and enhance extinction learning, d-cycloserine (DCS) has been examined as an augmenting agent of CBT. To direct children with OCD towards treatments with the highest likelihood of success, the current study evaluated the conditions under which DCS augmentation works best (i.e., moderators) and the baseline characteristics associated with outcome, irrespective of treatment type (i.e., predictors).

methodsData came from a two-site randomized controlled trial (N = 142) in which children received either DCS + CBT (n = 70) or placebo + CBT.

resultsNo baseline variables moderated the effects of DCS augmentation on CBT outcome. However, several predictor variables were associated with a decreased likelihood of achieving remission status, including higher family accommodation scores, higher impairment scores, higher depression scores, and higher externalizing scores. Furthermore, better insight at pre-treatment was associated with more improvement longitudinally on a clinician-rated summary measure of illness severity. LIMITATIONS: The current study did not examine all variables that had previously been shown to moderate or predict treatment outcome (e.g., family history of OCD or cognitive profile).

conclusionsThe absence of significant moderators suggests that baseline factors cannot yet be used to determine who benefits most from DCS. To maximize treatment benefits for children presenting with identified predictors of worse treatment outcome, clinicians might need to adapt existing CBT protocols and administer additional interventions that address patients' specific problem areas.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyAdolescentAntimetabolitesChildCombined Modality TherapyCycloserineFemaleHumansMaleObsessive-Compulsive DisorderProblem SolvingTreatment OutcomeAntimetabolitesCycloserinecognitive behavioral therapyD-Cycloserinemoderatorspediatric obsessive-compulsive disorderpredictors

Identifiers

PMID30149332
PMCPMC6129428
OpenAlexW2883399762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.