Trial reportBiology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation2019
KIR Donor Selection: Feasibility in Identifying better Donors.
Trial report in Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Indications for haematopoietic cell transplantation and CAR-T for haematological diseases, solid tumours and immune disorders: 2025 EBMT practice recommendations.Bone marrow transplantation · 2025Guideline
- Addressing the translation gap in SCT donor selection.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Increased donor inhibitory KIR are associated with reduced GVHD and improved survival following HLA-matched unrelated donor HCT in paediatric acute leukaemia.British journal of haematology · 2024Article
- Systematic evaluation of donor-KIR/recipient-HLA interactions in HLA-matched hematopoietic cell transplantation for AML.Blood advances · 2024Article
- The role and novel use of natural killer cells in graft-versus-leukemia reactions after allogeneic transplantation.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Indications for haematopoietic cell transplantation for haematological diseases, solid tumours and immune disorders: current practice in Europe, 2022.Bone marrow transplantation · 2022Article
- Practical Considerations and Workflow in Utilizing KIR Genotyping in Transplantation Medicine.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Increased donor inhibitory KIR with known HLA interactions provide protection from relapse following HLA matched unrelated donor HCT for AML.Bone marrow transplantation · 2021Article
- Relevance of Polymorphic KIR and HLA Class I Genes in NK-Cell-Based Immunotherapies for Adult Leukemic Patients.Cancers · 2021Review
- Following Transplantation for Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, DonorJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2021Article
- Prospective KIR genotype evaluation of hematopoietic cell donors is feasible with potential to benefit patients with AML.Blood advances · 2021Article
- Selection of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant donors to optimize natural killer cell alloreactivity.Seminars in hematology · 2020Article
- Immunogenetics in stem cell donor registry work: The DKMS example (Part 2).International journal of immunogenetics · 2020Review
- KIR B donors improve the outcome for AML patients given reduced intensity conditioning and unrelated donor transplantation.Blood advances · 2020Article
- Indications for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for haematological diseases, solid tumours and immune disorders: current practice in Europe, 2019.Bone marrow transplantation · 2019Review
- Allele-LevelFrontiers in immunology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We previously reported that acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) transplants using killer cell immunoglobulin-type receptor (KIR) B haplotype better or best (≥2 B activating gene loci ± Cen B/B) unrelated donors (URDs) yield less relapse and better survival. In this prospective trial we evaluated 535 AML searches from 14 participating centers with centralized donor KIR genotyping for donor selection. This represented 3% to 48% of all AML searches (median 20%) per center, totaling 3 to 172 patients (median 22) per center. Donor KIR genotype was reported at a median of 14 days after request (≤26 days for 76% of searches). In 535 searches, 2080 donors were requested for KIR genotyping (mean 4.3 per search); and a median of 1.8 (range, 0 to 4.5) per search were KIR typed. Choosing more donors for confirmatory HLA and KIR haplotype identification enriched the likelihood of finding KIR better or best donors. The search process identified a mean of 30% KIR better or best donors; the success ranged from 24% to 38% in the 11 centers enrolling ≥8 patients. More donors requested for KIR genotyping increased the likelihood of identifying KIR better or best haplotype donors. Of the 247 transplants, 9.3% used KIR best, 19% used KIR better, and 48% used KIR neutral donors while 24% used a non-KIR-tested donor. KIR genotyping did not delay transplantation. The time from search to transplant was identical for transplants using a KIR-genotyped versus a non-KIR-genotyped donor. Prospective evaluation can rapidly identify KIR favorable genotype donors, but choosing more donors per search would substantially increase the likelihood of having a KIR best or better donor available for transplantation. Transplant centers and donor registries must both commit extra effort to incorporate new characteristics (beyond HLA, age, and parity) into improved donor selection. Deliberate efforts to present additional genetic factors for donor selection will require novel procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.