ArticleSexually transmitted diseases2019
The Effect of Hormonal Contraception and Menstrual Cycle Timing on Genital Herpes Simplex Virus-2 Shedding and Lesions.
Article in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identifying the Multifactorial Triggers of Monthly Recurrent HSV-1 Reactivation: A Case Report.International medical case reports journal · 2025Article
- Contraceptive effects on the cervicovaginal microbiome: Recent evidence including randomized trials.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe effect of female sex hormones on herpes simplex virus (HSV)-2 shedding and lesion frequency is poorly understood. Previous studies suggest that hormonal contraception may increase the frequency of HSV-2 shedding.
methodsWe studied HSV-2 seropositive women who performed daily genital swabbing for HSV DNA and completed diaries for genital lesions and menses. We used Poisson mixed effects models to determine if HSV detection varied throughout the menstrual cycle, or in response to hormonal contraception. We used the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and rank-sum test to determine if lesion frequency differed by cycle phase or hormonal contraceptive use.
resultsIn 189 women aged 19 to 46 years who collected swabs on 10,715 days and were not using hormonal contraception, HSV-2 DNA was detected on 20.9% of days in the follicular phase and 17.8% of days in the luteal phase (rate ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.37, P = 0.02). Genital lesions did not differ in the follicular versus luteal phase (12.8% vs. 10.7%, P = 0.07). In analyses of hormonal contraception, including 244 women, HSV-2 DNA was detected on 19.0% of days for women not using hormonal contraception and 18.3% of days for those using hormonal contraception (P = 0.50). Lesions were present on 11.1% of days for women not using hormonal contraception, and 8.7% of days for those using hormonal contraception (P = 0.66).
conclusionsIn women with genital HSV-2 infection who are not using hormonal contraception, the follicular phase of the cycle may be associated with a higher frequency of HSV-2 shedding compared to the luteal phase. Lesion frequency is similar during the 2 menstrual phases. Hormonal contraception use was not observed to affect genital HSV-2 DNA detection or lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.