Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30148691›Full record

SynthesisHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2019

Comparative effectiveness of H7N9 vaccines in healthy individuals.

Dan Zheng, Feixia Gao, Cheng Zhao, Yahong Ding, Yemin Cao, Tianhan Yang, Xuesong Xu, Ze Chen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Leaf Saponins ofPharmaceutics · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dan Zhenga Department of Research and Development , Shanghai Institute of Biological Products , Shanghai , China.
Feixia Gaoa Department of Research and Development , Shanghai Institute of Biological Products , Shanghai , China.
Cheng Zhaob Shanghai TCM-Integrated Hospital , Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine , Shanghai , China.
Yahong Dinga Department of Research and Development , Shanghai Institute of Biological Products , Shanghai , China.
Yemin Caob Shanghai TCM-Integrated Hospital , Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine , Shanghai , China.
Tianhan Yanga Department of Research and Development , Shanghai Institute of Biological Products , Shanghai , China.
Xuesong Xud Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University , Shanghai , China.
Ze Chena Department of Research and Development , Shanghai Institute of Biological Products , Shanghai , China.
Shanghai Research Institute of Chemical Industry · CNShanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNHuadong Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAvian H7N9 influenza viruses possess a potential pandemic threat to public health worldwide, and have caused severe infection and high mortality in humans. A series of clinical trials of H7N9 vaccines have been completed. Meta-analyses need to be performed to assess the immunogenicity and safety of H7N9 vaccines.

methodsDatabase research with defined selection criteria was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, ClinicalTrials.gov, etc. Data from randomized clinical trials regarding the immunogenicity and safety of H7N9 vaccines were collected and meta-analyzed.

resultsFor non-adjuvanted H7N9 vaccines, high dose formulations induced limited immunogenicity and increased the risk of local and systemic adverse events, simultaneously. For adjuvanted H7N9 vaccines, on the one hand, ISCOMATRIX, MF59, AS03 and aluminium adjuvants applied in H7N9 vaccines could improve immune responses effectively, and non-aluminium adjuvants had superior performance in saving vaccine dose; on the other hand, aluminium adjuvant had the advantages of safety amongst these adjuvants applied in H7N9 vaccines.

conclusionH7N9 influenza vaccines with adjuvant might represent the optimal available option in an influenza pandemic, at present.

Indexed as

Influenza A Virus, H7N9 SubtypeAdjuvants, ImmunologicFemaleHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdjuvants, ImmunologicInfluenza VaccinesadjuvantH7N9 vaccineimmunogenicitymeta-analysissafety

Identifiers

PMID30148691
PMCPMC6363152
OpenAlexW2889091361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.