Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30148503›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2018

A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life.

Donovan H Parks, Maria Chuvochina, David W Waite, Christian Rinke, Adam Skarshewski, Pierre-Alain Chaumeil, Philip Hugenholtz

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1,834 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,834citing papers in PubMed
152.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05045807 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Randomised Controlled Trial to Investigate N-nitrosamine Formation After Meat Intake - Pilot Study of the Nitrate INFORMER Studies; Nitrate INFORMER Studies: Is Nitrosamine FORMation dEpenent on souRce

TypeinterventionalSponsorEdith Cowan UniversityRan2021 to 2021Enrolled6ConditionsHealth Risk BehaviorsArmsMeat with added nitrate, Meat with added nitrate plus vegetables
NCT05075720 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Randomised Controlled Trial to Investigate N-nitrosamine Formation After Meat Intake - Meat Study of the Nitrate INFORMER Studies; Nitrate INFORMER Studies: Is Nitrosamine FORMation dEpenent on souRce

TypeinterventionalSponsorEdith Cowan UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled25ConditionsHealth Risk BehaviorsArmsMeat with added nitrate, Meat without added nitrate, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,834 citing papers in PubMed, 3,751 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

1,774 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Donovan H ParksAustralian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.
Maria ChuvochinaAustralian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.
David W WaiteAustralian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.
Christian RinkeAustralian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4632-1187
Adam SkarshewskiAustralian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.
Pierre-Alain ChaumeilAustralian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.
Philip HugenholtzAustralian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5386-7925
The University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Taxonomy is an organizing principle of biology and is ideally based on evolutionary relationships among organisms. Development of a robust bacterial taxonomy has been hindered by an inability to obtain most bacteria in pure culture and, to a lesser extent, by the historical use of phenotypes to guide classification. Culture-independent sequencing technologies have matured sufficiently that a comprehensive genome-based taxonomy is now possible. We used a concatenated protein phylogeny as the basis for a bacterial taxonomy that conservatively removes polyphyletic groups and normalizes taxonomic ranks on the basis of relative evolutionary divergence. Under this approach, 58% of the 94,759 genomes comprising the Genome Taxonomy Database had changes to their existing taxonomy. This result includes the description of 99 phyla, including six major monophyletic units from the subdivision of the Proteobacteria, and amalgamation of the Candidate Phyla Radiation into a single phylum. Our taxonomy should enable improved classification of uncultured bacteria and provide a sound basis for ecological and evolutionary studies.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialPhylogenyBacteriaDatabases, GeneticGenomicsSoftware

Identifiers

PMID30148503
OpenAlexW2889019390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.