Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30148183›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology letters2017

Fluorinated Compounds in U.S. Fast Food Packaging.

Laurel A Schaider, Simona A Balan, Arlene Blum, David Q Andrews, Mark J Strynar, Margaret E Dickinson, David M Lunderberg, Johnsie R Lang, Graham F Peaslee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology letters, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
26.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 569 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Dietary and social predictors of PFAS exposure in Hispanic children from Northern Virginia.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Laurel A SchaiderSilent Spring Institute, Newton, Massachusetts 02460, United States.
Simona A BalanCalifornia Department of Toxic Substances Control, Sacramento, California 95814, United States.
Arlene BlumGreen Science Policy Institute, Berkeley, California 94709, United States.
David Q AndrewsEnvironmental Working Group, Washington, D.C. 20009, United States.
Mark J StrynarNational Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.
Margaret E DickinsonChemistry Department, Hope College, Holland, Michigan 49423, United States.
David M LunderbergChemistry Department, Hope College, Holland, Michigan 49423, United States.
Johnsie R LangOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States.
Graham F PeasleeDepartment of Physics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States.
Hope College · USCalifornia Department of Toxic Substances Control · USEnvironmental Protection Agency · USMedia Working Group · USOak Ridge Associated Universities · USPublic Policy Institute of California · USSilent Spring Institute · USUniversity of Notre Dame · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are highly persistent synthetic chemicals, some of which have been associated with cancer, developmental toxicity, immunotoxicity, and other health effects. PFASs in grease-resistant food packaging can leach into food and increase dietary exposure. We collected ~400 samples of food contact papers, paperboard containers, and beverage containers from fast food restaurants throughout the United States and measured total fluorine using particle-induced γ-ray emission (PIGE) spectroscopy. PIGE can rapidly and inexpensively measure total fluorine in solid-phase samples. We found that 46% of food contact papers and 20% of paperboard samples contained detectable fluorine (>16 nmol/cm2). Liquid chromatography/high-resolution mass spectrometry analysis of a subset of 20 samples found perfluorocarboxylates, perfluorosulfonates, and other known PFASs and/or unidentified polyfluorinated compounds (based on nontargeted analysis). The total peak area for PFASs was higher in 70% of samples (10 of 14) with a total fluorine level of >200 nmol/cm2 compared to six samples with a total fluorine level of <16 nmol/cm2. Samples with high total fluorine levels but low levels of measured PFASs may contain volatile PFASs, PFAS polymers, newer replacement PFASs, or other fluorinated compounds. The prevalence of fluorinated chemicals in fast food packaging demonstrates their potentially significant contribution to dietary PFAS exposure and environmental contamination during production and disposal.

Identifiers

PMID30148183
PMCPMC6104644
OpenAlexW2585227901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.