Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30148165›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2018

A Comparison of Traditional and Novel Methods for the Separation of Exosomes from Human Samples.

Li-Li Yu, Jing Zhu, Jin-Xia Liu, Feng Jiang, Wen-Kai Ni, Li-Shuai Qu, Run-Zhou Ni, Cui-Hua Lu, Ming-Bing Xiao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 140 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
140citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

140 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Transcriptomic and functional analysis of fibroid extracellular vesicles.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Li-Li Yu *Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226001, China.
Jing Zhu *Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226001, China.
Jin-Xia LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226001, China.
Feng JiangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226001, China.
Wen-Kai NiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226001, China.
Li-Shuai QuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226001, China.
Run-Zhou NiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226001, China.
Cui-Hua LuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226001, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1377-5820
Ming-Bing XiaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226001, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3372-1069

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exosomes are discrete populations of small (40-200 nm in diameter) membranous vesicles that are released into the extracellular space by most cell types, eventually accumulating in the circulation. As molecular messengers, exosomes exert a broad array of vital physiologic functions by transporting information between different cell types. Because of these functional properties, they may have potential as biomarker sources for prognostic and diagnostic disease. Recent research has found that exosomes have potential to be utilized as drug delivery agents for therapeutic targets. However, basic researches on exosomes and researches on their therapeutic potential both require the existence of effective and rapid methods for their separation from human samples. In the current absence of a standardized method, there are several methods available for the separation of exosomes, but very few studies have previously compared the efficiency and suitability of these different methods. This review summarized and compared the available traditional and novel methods for the extraction of exosomes from human samples and considered their advantages and disadvantages for use in clinical laboratories and point-of-care settings.

Indexed as

ExosomesSpecimen HandlingBiological TransportBiomarkersHumansPrognosisProteinsBiomarkersProteins

Identifiers

PMID30148165
PMCPMC6083592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.