Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30148063›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone oncology2018

Epidemiology of benign giant cell tumor of bone in the Chinese population.

Alexander Liede, Rohini K Hernandez, En-Tzu Tang, Chuang Li, Brian Bennett, Steven S Wong, Danielle Jandial

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander LiedeCenter for Observational Research, Amgen, 1120 Veterans Boulevard, ASF3, Thousand Oaks and South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Rohini K HernandezCenter for Observational Research, Amgen, 1120 Veterans Boulevard, ASF3, Thousand Oaks and South San Francisco, CA, USA.
En-Tzu TangOncology, R&D, Amgen China, RM. 1501∼1506, 15F of Platinum Tower, No. 233 Taicang Road, HuangPu District, Shanghai 200020 PR China.
Chuang LiOncology, R&D, Amgen China, RM. 1501∼1506, 15F of Platinum Tower, No. 233 Taicang Road, HuangPu District, Shanghai 200020 PR China.
Brian BennettPlan A Inc., 759 Villa Street, Suite A, Mountain View, CA 94041, USA.
Steven S WongPlan A Inc., 759 Villa Street, Suite A, Mountain View, CA 94041, USA.
Danielle JandialGlobal Development (Oncology), Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, MS 38-2-B, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1799, USA.
Amgen (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuantifying the incidence of giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone is challenging because it is a rare, histologically benign bone tumor for which population-level statistics are unavailable in most countries. We estimated the 2017 incidence of GCT in China using a direct (registry-based) approach with available population-based data. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe most recent age- and sex-specific incidence rates of GCT recorded in the Bone Tumor Registry in Japan (2015) were applied to 2017 age- and sex-matched populations projected by the United Nations for China in order to estimate 2017 incidence. An adjustment factor calculated using registry data suggesting that GCT may represent a greater proportion of bone tumors in China than in Japan (Guo, 1999) was applied to provide secondary estimates.

resultsAnnual GCT incidence was estimated to be 1.49 per million population or 2094 new cases in China for 2017. A comparison of this estimated incidence with Japan (1.25 per million) and the United States (1.38 per million) indicates that the incidence is somewhat higher in China using identical methods. Secondary estimates suggest that GCT incidence in China may be as high as 2.57 per million or 3625 new cases in 2017. The corresponding 3-year limited-duration prevalence of GCT in China using a registry-based approach and general age-specific mortality is 6276 (secondary estimate: 10,876).

conclusionsLeveraging unique population-based registry data, we estimated that GCT is a rare disease in the Chinese population with an incidence ranging between 1.49 and 2.57 cases per million persons per year. Possible differences in diagnostic classification of GCT, urban-rural demographics, and the younger demographic distribution of the Chinese population may underlie observations that GCT, a condition that primarily affects young individuals (20-40 years of age), accounts for a higher proportion of skeletal tumors in China than in other regions.

Indexed as

BMUS, The Burden of Musculoskeletal Diseases in the United StatesChinaGCT, giant cell tumorGiant cell tumorIncidenceJapanRANKLRANKL, receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligandSTROBE, Strengthening of Reporting of Observational Studies in EpidemiologyUnited StatesU.N., United NationsU.S., United States

Identifiers

PMID30148063
PMCPMC6107898
OpenAlexW2884537382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.